BMW 420d xDrive
190 hp, 7,4 s 0-100 : among the 88 saloons 2018–2022, the 420d xDrive ranks 10th of 88 in Combined consumption, 5th of 77 in Tank range, 65th of 88 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 190 hp
- 400 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 7.4 s
- VMax 238 km/h
- Cons.
- 4.6 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 59 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 4 cyl.
- Displacement
- 1,995 cm³
- Power
- 190 hp
- Couple
- 400 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 4.6 L/100 km
- Tank
- 59 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 7,4 s
- VMax
- 238 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,768 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,851 mm
- Width
- 1,852 mm
- Height
- 1,390 mm
- Boot
- 440 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,670 kg
- Cd
- 0.25
- CO₂ WLTP
- 121 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 88 saloons, the 420d xDrive ranks (top 10 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 10th of 88 in Combined consumption (4.6 L/100), 5th of 77 in Tank range (1283 km).
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW 420d (1st with 4.2 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW 420d (1st with 1405 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 4.6 L/100 L/100 (10th of 88 in Combined consumption)
The 420d xDrive consumes 4.6 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW 420d (4.2 L/100).
Tank range: 1283 km (5th of 77 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 420d xDrive covers 1283 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1405 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the 420d xDrive stands against saloons
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Popular duels involving the 420d xDrive
Continue with the BMW 420d xDrive
The same car, from other angles.
BMW 420d xDrive: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the 420d xDrive rank in its segment?
Among the 88 saloons 2018–2022, the 420d xDrive ranks 10th of 88 in Combined consumption (4.6 L/100, behind the BMW 420d), 5th of 77 in Tank range (1283 km, behind the BMW 420d), 65th of 88 in 0–100 km/h (7.4 s, behind the BMW M3 Competition xDrive).
What is the range of the 420d xDrive?
1283 km on a full tank (4.6 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 5th of 77 in autonomie du segment.
How much does the 420d xDrive cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW 420d instead?
The BMW 420d leads in Combined consumption (4.2 L/100 vs 4.6 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 420d xDrive vs BMW 420d duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.