G20 · GENERATION 2020 · SALOON
BMWMHEV

320d xDrive Touring

188 hp, 7,4 s 0-100 : among the 88 saloons 2018–2022, the 320d xDrive Touring ranks 13th of 88 in Combined consumption, 6th of 77 in Tank range, 64th of 88 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,54415,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

188hp

400 Nm · 11 hp elec

0 → 100 km/h

7.4s

VMax 225 km/h

Cons.

4.7L

/100 km

Tank

59L

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW 320d xDrive Touring

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Displacement1,995 cm³
Puissance électrique11 hp
Combined power188 hp
Couple400 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP4.7 L/100km
Tank59 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h7,4 s
VMax225 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,709 mm
Wheelbase2,851 mm
Width1,827 mm
Height1,445 mm
Boot500 L
Kerb weight1,765 kg
Cd0.27
CO₂ WLTP125 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 88 saloons, the 320d xDrive Touring ranks (top 13 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 13th of 88 in Combined consumption (4.7 L/100), 6th of 77 in Tank range (1255 km).

Less suitable for

Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw 420d (1st with 4.2 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw 420d (1st with 1405 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 4.7 L/100 L/100 (13th of 88 in Combined consumption)

The 320d xDrive Touring consumes 4.7 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 420d (4.2 L/100).

Tank range: 1255 km (6th of 77 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the 320d xDrive Touring covers 1255 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1405 km.

Segment positioning

Where the 320d xDrive Touring stands against saloons

Comparison across 88 saloons marketed between 2018–2022.

Combined consumption13e / 88
4.7 L/100
Min 12.7 L/100 · Ford Mustang GT S550 450Max 4.2 L/100 · Bmw 420d
Tank range6e / 77
1 255 km
Min 480 km · Ford Mustang GT S550 450Max 1 405 km · Bmw 420d
0–100 km/h64e / 88
7,4 s
Min 8,9 s · Bmw 318d TouringMax 3,5 s · BMW M3 Competition xDrive

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW 3 Series G20 range

Generation G20 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the G20

Compare

Popular duels involving the 320d xDrive Touring

Frequently asked questions

BMW 320d xDrive Touring: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 88 saloons 2018–2022, the 320d xDrive Touring ranks 13th of 88 in Combined consumption (4.7 L/100, behind the Bmw 420d), 6th of 77 in Tank range (1255 km, behind the Bmw 420d), 64th of 88 in 0–100 km/h (7.4 s, behind the BMW M3 Competition xDrive).

1255 km on a full tank (4.7 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 6th of 77 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Bmw 420d leads in Combined consumption (4.2 L/100 vs 4.7 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 320d xDrive Touring vs Bmw 420d duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.