BMW 320i Touring
184 hp, 7,5 s 0-100 : among the 86 saloons 2019–2023, the 320i Touring ranks 36th of 86 in Combined consumption, 22th of 73 in Tank range, 65th of 86 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 184 hp
- 300 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 7.5 s
- VMax 230 km/h
- Cons.
- 6.1 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 59 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Displacement
- 1,998 cm³
- Power
- 184 hp
- Couple
- 300 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 6.1 L/100 km
- Tank
- 59 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 7,5 s
- VMax
- 230 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,709 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,851 mm
- Width
- 1,827 mm
- Height
- 1,440 mm
- Boot
- 500 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,570 kg
- Cd
- 0.27
- CO₂ WLTP
- 140 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 86 saloons, the 320i Touring ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
saloon among the best in segment: 22th of 73 in Tank range (967 km).
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW 420d (1st with 4.2 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW 420d (1st with 1405 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 6.1 L/100 L/100 (36th of 86 in Combined consumption)
The 320i Touring consumes 6.1 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW 420d (4.2 L/100).
Tank range: 967 km (22th of 73 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 320i Touring covers 967 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1405 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the 320i Touring stands against saloons
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW 3 Series G20 range
Generation G20 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G20
Popular duels involving the 320i Touring
Continue with the BMW 320i Touring
The same car, from other angles.
BMW 320i Touring: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the 320i Touring rank in its segment?
Among the 86 saloons 2019–2023, the 320i Touring ranks 36th of 86 in Combined consumption (6.1 L/100, behind the BMW 420d), 22th of 73 in Tank range (967 km, behind the BMW 420d), 65th of 86 in 0–100 km/h (7.5 s, behind the BMW M3 Competition xDrive).
What is the range of the 320i Touring?
967 km on a full tank (6.1 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 22th of 73 in autonomie du segment.
How much does the 320i Touring cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW 420d instead?
The BMW 420d leads in Combined consumption (4.2 L/100 vs 6.1 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 320i Touring vs BMW 420d duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.