Among the 99 grand tourers 2018–2022, the 520d ranks 1st of 99 in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100, behind the Bmw 520d), 1st of 95 in Tank range (1535 km, behind the Bmw 520d), 76th of 99 in 0–100 km/h (7.2 s, behind the Bmw M5 CS).
BMW 520d
190 hp, 7,2 s 0-100 : among the 99 grand tourers 2018–2022, the 520d ranks 1st of 99 in Combined consumption, 1st of 95 in Tank range, 76th of 99 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
190hp
400 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
7.2s
VMax 235 km/h
Cons.
4.3L
/100 km
Tank
66L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 4 cyl.
- Displacement
- 1,995 cm³
- Power
- 190 hp
- Couple
- 400 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Propulsion
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 4.3 L/100 km
- Tank
- 66 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 7,2 s
- VMax
- 235 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,963 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,975 mm
- Width
- 1,868 mm
- Height
- 1,479 mm
- Boot
- 530 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,675 kg
- Cd
- 0.23
- CO₂ WLTP
- 112 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 99 grand tourers, the 520d ranks (best in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 1st of 99 in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100), 1st of 95 in Tank range (1535 km).
Less suitable for
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
Alternatives to consider
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Bmw M5 CS (1st with 3.0 s) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 4.3 L/100 L/100 (1st of 99 in Combined consumption)
The 520d consumes 4.3 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw 520d (4.3 L/100).
Tank range: 1535 km (1st of 95 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 520d covers 1535 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1535 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripChronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performanceWhere the 520d stands against grand tourers
Comparison across 99 grand tourers marketed between 2018–2022.
Combined consumption1e / 99
4.3 L/100
Min 11.3 L/100 · Bmw M5Max 4.3 L/100 · Bmw 520d
Tank range1e / 95
1 535 km
Min 602 km · Bmw M5Max 1 535 km · Bmw 520d
0–100 km/h76e / 99
7,2 s
Min 8,2 s · Bmw 520iMax 3,0 s · Bmw M5 CS
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
DieselAudi A6 Avant204 hp · 7.0 sDieselAudi A6 Avant TDI S tronic 150 kW204 hp · 7.9 sDieselAudi A6 Sedan204 hp · 6.9 sDieselAudi A6 Sedan204 hp · 7.8 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW 5 Series G30 range
Generation G30 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G30
Popular duels involving the 520d
BMW 520d: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
1535 km on a full tank (4.3 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 1st of 95 in autonomie du segment.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.