C8 · GENERATION 2026 · GRAND TOURER
AudiICE

A6 Sedan

204 hp, 6,9 s 0-100 : among the 17 grand tourers 2024–2028, the A6 Sedan ranks 6th of 17 in Combined consumption, 3rd of 11 in Tank range, 8th of 17 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,90515,000 km · UK mix · home 0,21 £/kWhConsumption →

Power

204hp

400 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

6.9s

VMax 243 km/h

Cons.

5.8L

/100 km

Tank

60L

Technical identity card

Full specifications Audi A6 Sedan

Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.

Powertrain

Displacement1,968 cm³
Power204 hp
Couple400 Nm
GearboxConvertisseur de couple 7 rapports Automatique
TransmissionIntegrale (AWD)

Consumption

Cons. WLTP5.8 L/100km
Tank60 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h6,9 s
VMax243 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,999 mm
Wheelbase2,927 mm
Width1,875 mm
Height1,418 mm
Boot452 L
Kerb weight1,980 kg
Cd0.26
CO₂ WLTP152 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance

Among the 17 grand tourers, the A6 Sedan ranks (top 6 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis

Tailored to this vehicle?

Caralogy Verdict
Suitable for

Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 6th of 17 in Combined consumption (5.8 L/100), 3rd of 11 in Tank range (1034 km).

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Mercedes E 220 d (1st with 5.4 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Audi A6 Sedan (1st with 1071 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 5.8 L/100 L/100 (6th of 17 in Combined consumption)

The A6 Sedan consumes 5.8 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Mercedes E 220 d (5.4 L/100).

Tank range: 1034 km (3rd of 11 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the A6 Sedan covers 1034 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1071 km.

Segment positioning

Where the A6 Sedan stands against grand tourers

Comparison across 17 grand tourers marketed between 2024–2028.

Combined consumption6e / 17
5.8 L/100
Min 8.3 L/100 · Audi A6 Avant TFSI quattro S tronic 270 kWMax 5.4 L/100 · Mercedes E 220 d
Tank range3e / 11
1 034 km
Min 675 km · Audi A6 Avant TFSI quattro S tronic 270 kWMax 1 071 km · Audi A6 Sedan
0–100 km/h8e / 17
6,9 s
Min 8,3 s · Audi A6 Avant TFSI S tronic 150 kWMax 4,7 s · Audi A6 Sedan TFSI quattro S tronic 270 kW

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full Audi A6 C8 range

Generation C8 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the C8

Compare

Popular duels involving the A6 Sedan

Frequently asked questions

Audi A6 Sedan: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Among the 17 grand tourers 2024–2028, the A6 Sedan ranks 6th of 17 in Combined consumption (5.8 L/100, behind the Mercedes E 220 d), 3rd of 11 in Tank range (1034 km, behind the Audi A6 Sedan), 8th of 17 in 0–100 km/h (6.9 s, behind the Audi A6 Sedan TFSI quattro S tronic 270 kW).

1034 km on a full tank (5.8 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 3rd of 11 in autonomie du segment.

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

The Mercedes E 220 d leads in Combined consumption (5.4 L/100 vs 5.8 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the A6 Sedan vs Mercedes E 220 d duel for a detailed comparison.

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.