BMW 520i
184 hp, 7,9 s 0-100 : among the 99 grand tourers 2018–2022, the 520i ranks 32th of 99 in Combined consumption, 30th of 95 in Tank range, 94th of 99 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 184 hp
- 290 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 7.9 s
- VMax 235 km/h
- Cons.
- 5.5 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 68 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Displacement
- 1,998 cm³
- Power
- 184 hp
- Couple
- 290 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Propulsion
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 5.5 L/100 km
- Tank
- 68 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 7,9 s
- VMax
- 235 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,963 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,975 mm
- Width
- 1,868 mm
- Height
- 1,479 mm
- Boot
- 530 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,610 kg
- Cd
- 0.23
- CO₂ WLTP
- 125 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 99 grand tourers, the 520i ranks (top 32 in segment) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 32th of 99 in Combined consumption (5.5 L/100), 30th of 95 in Tank range (1236 km).
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW 520d (1st with 4.3 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW 520d (1st with 1535 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 5.5 L/100 L/100 (32th of 99 in Combined consumption)
The 520i consumes 5.5 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW 520d (4.3 L/100).
Tank range: 1236 km (30th of 95 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the 520i covers 1236 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1535 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the 520i stands against grand tourers
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW 5 Series G30 range
Generation G30 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G30
Popular duels involving the 520i
Continue with the BMW 520i
The same car, from other angles.
BMW 520i: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the 520i rank in its segment?
Among the 99 grand tourers 2018–2022, the 520i ranks 32th of 99 in Combined consumption (5.5 L/100, behind the BMW 520d), 30th of 95 in Tank range (1236 km, behind the BMW 520d), 94th of 99 in 0–100 km/h (7.9 s, behind the BMW M5 CS).
What is the range of the 520i?
1236 km on a full tank (5.5 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 30th of 95 in Tank range.
How much does the 520i cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW 520d instead?
The BMW 520d leads in Combined consumption (4.3 L/100 vs 5.5 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 520i vs BMW 520d duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.