BMW 840d xDrive
340 hp, 4,8 s 0-100 : among the 36 limousines 2019–2023, the 840d xDrive ranks 19th of 36 in 0–100 km/h, 8th of 36 in Top speed, 30th of 36 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 340 hp
- 700 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 4.8 s
- VMax 250 km/h
- Cons.
- 5.8 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 66 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 6 cyl.
- Displacement
- 2,993 cm³
- Power
- 340 hp
- Couple
- 700 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 5.8 L/100 km
- Tank
- 66 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 4,8 s
- VMax
- 250 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,843 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,822 mm
- Width
- 1,902 mm
- Height
- 1,341 mm
- Boot
- 420 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,915 kg
- Cd
- 0.29
- CO₂ WLTP
- 154 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 36 limousines, the 840d xDrive ranks (mid-table) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Good compromise for regular use without available charging infrastructure. 8th of 36 in Top speed (250 km/h).
Regular family use with bulky luggage. The space and boot are sport-calibrated, not utility. A sedan or SUV from the same manufacturer would be more practical daily.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Panamera Turbo S (1st with 3.0 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Panamera Turbo S (1st with 315 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 4.8 s 0-100 (19th of 36 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the 840d xDrive ranks 19th of 36 in 0–100 km/h, 1.8 s off the reference Porsche Panamera Turbo S (3.0 s).
Top speed: 250 km/h (8th of 36 in Top speed)
Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 315 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the 840d xDrive stands against limousines
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW 8 Series G15 range
Generation G15 launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the G15
Popular duels involving the 840d xDrive
Continue with the BMW 840d xDrive
The same car, from other angles.
BMW 840d xDrive: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the 840d xDrive rank in its segment?
Among the 36 limousines 2019–2023, the 840d xDrive ranks 19th of 36 in 0–100 km/h (4.8 s, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo S), 8th of 36 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo S), 30th of 36 in Power-to-weight (178 hp/t, behind the BMW M8 Competition Coupe).
How much does the 840d xDrive cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a Porsche Panamera Turbo S instead?
The Porsche Panamera Turbo S leads in 0–100 km/h (3.0 s vs 4.8 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 840d xDrive vs Porsche Panamera Turbo S duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.