Among the 14 limousines hybrid 2023–2027, the A8 L 55 TFSI quattro tiptronic 250 kW MHEV ranks 14th of 14 in 0–100 km/h (5.7 s, behind the Mercedes S 580 4MATIC Limousine Langversion), 10th of 14 in Top speed (250 km/h, behind the Mercedes S 350 d 4MATIC Limousine Langversion), 10th of 14 in Power-to-weight (172 hp/t, behind the Mercedes S 580 4MATIC Limousine).
A8 L 55 TFSI quattro tiptronic 250 kW MHEV
340 hp, 5,7 s 0-100 : among the 14 limousines hybrid 2023–2027, the A8 L 55 TFSI quattro tiptronic 250 kW MHEV ranks 14th of 14 in 0–100 km/h, 10th of 14 in Top speed, 10th of 14 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
340hp
500 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
5.7s
VMax 250 km/h
Cons.
10.4L
/100 km
Tank
82L
Full specifications Audi A8 L 55 TFSI quattro tiptronic 250 kW MHEV
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Unknown |
| Displacement | 2,995 cm\u00b3 |
| Power | 340 hp |
| Couple | 500 Nm |
| Gearbox | Torque Converter 8 rapports Automatic |
| Transmission | AWD |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 10,4 L/100km |
| Tank | 82 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 5,7 s |
| VMax | 250 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 5,320 mm |
| Wheelbase | 3,128 mm |
| Width | 1,945 mm |
| Height | 1,476 mm |
| Boot | 505 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,980 kg |
| Cd | 0.27 |
| CO₂ WLTP | 236 g/km |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 14 limousines hybrid, the A8 L 55 TFSI quattro tiptronic 250 kW MHEV ranks (last in segment) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Optimised urban and peri-urban trips with no charging to manage.
Home charging access not leveraged. If you have a dedicated outlet, a PHEV would allow daily commutes in pure electric mode.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Mercedes S 580 4MATIC Limousine Langversion (1st with 4.0 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Mercedes S 350 d 4MATIC Limousine Langversion (1st with 250 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 5.7 s 0-100 (14th of 14 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the A8 L 55 TFSI quattro tiptronic 250 kW MHEV ranks 14th of 14 in 0–100 km/h, 1.7 s off the reference Mercedes S 580 4MATIC Limousine Langversion (4.0 s).
Top speed: 250 km/h (10th of 14 in Top speed)
Top speed of 250 km/h. The segment reference reaches 250 km/h.
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Where the A8 L 55 TFSI quattro tiptronic 250 kW MHEV stands against limousines hybrid
Comparison across 14 limousines hybrid marketed between 2023–2027.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Audi A8 D5 range
Generation D5 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the D5
Popular duels involving the A8 L 55 TFSI quattro tiptronic 250 kW MHEV
Audi A8 L 55 TFSI quattro tiptronic 250 kW MHEV: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Mercedes S 580 4MATIC Limousine Langversion leads in 0–100 km/h (4.0 s vs 5.7 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the A8 L 55 TFSI quattro tiptronic 250 kW MHEV vs Mercedes S 580 4MATIC Limousine Langversion duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.