Porsche Panamera
335 hp, 5,3 s 0-100 : among the 30 limousines 2016–2020, the Panamera ranks 26th of 30 in 0–100 km/h, 7th of 30 in Top speed, 20th of 30 in Power-to-weight. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 335 hp
- 449 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 5.3 s
- VMax 264 km/h
- Cons.
- 9.8 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 23.7 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- V · 6 cyl. · Turbo
- Displacement
- 3 cm³
- ICE power
- 335 hp
- Combined power
- 335 hp
- Combined torque
- 449 Nm
- Gearbox
- Double embrayage 8 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Propulsion
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 9.8 L/100 km
- Tank
- 23.7 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 5,3 s
- VMax
- 264 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 5,050 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,949 mm
- Width
- 1,938 mm
- Height
- 1,422 mm
- Boot
- 18 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,815 kg
- Cd
- 0.28
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 30 limousines, the Panamera ranks (in the bottom third) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
Demanding drivers: 7th of 30 in Top speed (264 km/h). 7th of 30 in Top speed (264 km/h).
Frequent urban trips with stop-and-go. At 9,8 L/100 km on the combined cycle, consumption rises in the city without electric assistance. An HEV or PHEV would be more economical for this use profile.
If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Porsche Panamera Turbo (1st with 3.6 s) takes the lead. If the priority is Top speed, the Porsche Panamera Turbo (1st with 308 km/h) takes the lead.
Acceleration: 5.3 s 0-100 (26th of 30 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the Panamera ranks 26th of 30 in 0–100 km/h, 1.7 s off the reference Porsche Panamera Turbo (3.6 s).
Top speed: 264 km/h (7th of 30 in Top speed)
Top speed of 264 km/h. The segment reference reaches 308 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the Panamera stands against limousines
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Porsche Panamera 971 range
Generation 971 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 971
Popular duels involving the Panamera
Continue with the Porsche Panamera
The same car, from other angles.
Porsche Panamera: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the Panamera rank in its segment?
Among the 30 limousines 2016–2020, the Panamera ranks 26th of 30 in 0–100 km/h (5.3 s, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo), 7th of 30 in Top speed (264 km/h, behind the Porsche Panamera Turbo), 20th of 30 in Power-to-weight (185 hp/t, behind the BMW M850i xDrive).
How much does the Panamera cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a Porsche Panamera Turbo instead?
The Porsche Panamera Turbo leads in 0–100 km/h (3.6 s vs 5.3 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the Panamera vs Porsche Panamera Turbo duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.