BMW X2 xDrive20i
178 hp, 7,3 s 0-100 : among the 30 C-SUV 2019–2023, the X2 xDrive20i ranks 17th of 30 in Combined consumption, 9th of 25 in Tank range, 7th of 30 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
- Power
- 178 hp
- 280 Nm
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 7.3 s
- VMax 224 km/h
- Cons.
- 6.6 L
- /100 km
- Tank
- 61 L
Full specifications
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
- Architecture
- 4 cyl.
- Displacement
- 1,998 cm³
- Power
- 178 hp
- Couple
- 280 Nm
- Gearbox
- Convertisseur de couple 8 rapports Automatique
- Transmission
- Integrale (AWD)
Consumption
- Cons. WLTP
- 6.6 L/100 km
- Tank
- 61 L
Performance
- 0 → 100 km/h
- 7,3 s
- VMax
- 224 km/h
Dimensions and environment
- Length
- 4,360 mm
- Wheelbase
- 2,670 mm
- Width
- 1,824 mm
- Height
- 1,526 mm
- Boot
- 470 L
- Kerb weight
- 1,565 kg
- Cd
- 0.29
- CO₂ WLTP
- 152 g/km
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodologyManufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 30 C-SUV, the X2 xDrive20i ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
C-SUV among the best in segment: 9th of 25 in Tank range (924 km), 7th of 30 in 0–100 km/h (7.3 s).
If the priority is Combined consumption, the BMW X2 sDrive18d (1st with 4.8 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the BMW X2 sDrive18d (1st with 1063 km) takes the lead.
Fuel consumption: 6.6 L/100 L/100 (17th of 30 in Combined consumption)
The X2 xDrive20i consumes 6.6 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the BMW X2 sDrive18d (4.8 L/100).
Tank range: 924 km (9th of 25 in Tank range)
On a full tank, the X2 xDrive20i covers 924 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1063 km.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulatorLong-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a tripTimes & acceleration
0-100, 0-200, speed curve, segment position.
See the performanceWhere the X2 xDrive20i stands against C-SUV
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full BMW X2 F39 range
Generation F39 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the F39
Popular duels involving the X2 xDrive20i
Continue with the BMW X2 xDrive20i
The same car, from other angles.
BMW X2 xDrive20i: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Where does the X2 xDrive20i rank in its segment?
Among the 30 C-SUV 2019–2023, the X2 xDrive20i ranks 17th of 30 in Combined consumption (6.6 L/100, behind the BMW X2 sDrive18d), 9th of 25 in Tank range (924 km, behind the BMW X2 sDrive18d), 7th of 30 in 0–100 km/h (7.3 s, behind the Cupra Formentor VZ).
What is the range of the X2 xDrive20i?
924 km on a full tank (6.6 L/100 on the combined cycle) - 9th of 25 in Tank range.
How much does the X2 xDrive20i cost to run?
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
Why not a BMW X2 sDrive18d instead?
The BMW X2 sDrive18d leads in Combined consumption (4.8 L/100 vs 6.6 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X2 xDrive20i vs BMW X2 sDrive18d duel for a detailed comparison.
How does Caralogy calculate its figures?
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.