F39 · GENERATION 2021 · COMPACT SUV
BMWICE

X2 xDrive20i

178 hp, 7,3 s 0-100 : among the 37 C-SUV 2019–2023, the X2 xDrive20i ranks 23th of 37 in Combined consumption, 11th of 33 in Tank range, 9th of 37 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.

Energy cost · estimate1,70315,000 km · UK mix · home UK £/kWhCustomise →

Power

178hp

280 Nm

0 → 100 km/h

7.3s

VMax 224 km/h

Cons.

6.6L

/100 km

Tank

61L

Sur cette page

Technical identity card

Full specifications BMW X2 xDrive20i

Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.

Powertrain

ArchitectureUnknown · 4 cyl.
Displacement1,998 cm\u00b3
Power178 hp
Couple280 Nm
GearboxTorque Converter 8 rapports Automatic
TransmissionAWD

Consumption

Cons. WLTP6,6 L/100km
Tank61 L

Performance

0 → 100 km/h7,3 s
VMax224 km/h

Dimensions and environment

Length4,360 mm
Wheelbase2,670 mm
Width1,824 mm
Height1,526 mm
Boot470 L
Kerb weight1,565 kg
Cd0.29
CO₂ WLTP152 g/km

Caralogy Methodology

Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).

See full methodology →

Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine

Among the 37 C-SUV, the X2 xDrive20i ranks (mid-table) in fuel consumption. Caralogy simulates its real-world cost: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.

Caralogy Analysis · tailored to this vehicle

Caralogy Verdict

Suitable for

C-SUV among the best in segment: 11th of 33 in Tank range (924 km), 9th of 37 in 0–100 km/h (7.3 s).

Alternatives to consider

If the priority is Combined consumption, the Bmw X2 sDrive18d (1st with 4.8 L/100) takes the lead. If the priority is Tank range, the Bmw X2 sDrive18d (1st with 1063 km) takes the lead.

Fuel consumption: 6.6 L/100 L/100 (23th of 37 in Combined consumption)

The X2 xDrive20i consumes 6.6 L/100 on the WLTP combined cycle. The segment reference is the Bmw X2 sDrive18d (4.8 L/100).

Tank range: 924 km (11th of 33 in Tank range)

On a full tank, the X2 xDrive20i covers 924 km on the combined cycle. The segment reference reaches 1063 km.

Segment positioning

Where the X2 xDrive20i stands against C-SUV

Comparison across 37 C-SUV marketed between 2019–2023.

Combined consumption

23eout of 37

6.6 L/100
Min8.6 L/100 · Cupra Formentor VZ
Max4.8 L/100 · Bmw X2 sDrive18d

Tank range

11eout of 33

924 km
Min705 km · SEAT Ateca 2.0 TSI 190 FR 4Drive 7DSG
Max1 063 km · Bmw X2 sDrive18d

0–100 km/h

9eout of 37

7,3 s
Min11,0 s · Kia Niro HEV FWD
Max4,9 s · Cupra Formentor VZ

Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)

Cross-energy alternatives

Same needs, different powertrain.

Model family

The full BMW X2 F39 range

Generation F39 launched in 2018. Available versions sorted by energy.

Other versions of the F39

Compare

Popular duels involving the X2 xDrive20i

Take the next step

Find a X2 xDrive20i or value yours

Caralogy receives no commission on these external links.

Frequently asked questions

BMW X2 xDrive20i: what you need to know

Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.

Where does the X2 xDrive20i rank in its segment?#

Among the 37 C-SUV 2019–2023, the X2 xDrive20i ranks 23th of 37 in Combined consumption (6.6 L/100, behind the Bmw X2 sDrive18d), 11th of 33 in Tank range (924 km, behind the Bmw X2 sDrive18d), 9th of 37 in 0–100 km/h (7.3 s, behind the Cupra Formentor VZ).

What is the range of the X2 xDrive20i?#

924 km on a full tank (6.6 L/100 on the combined cycle) — 11th of 33 in autonomie du segment.

How much does the X2 xDrive20i cost to run?#

Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.

Why not a Bmw X2 sDrive18d instead?#

The Bmw X2 sDrive18d leads in Combined consumption (4.8 L/100 vs 6.6 L/100). The choice depends on your priorities: check the X2 xDrive20i vs Bmw X2 sDrive18d duel for a detailed comparison.

How does Caralogy calculate its figures?#

Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.