Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Consumption
  3. /SUV
iXvse-tronBEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsiX · e-tron

BMW iX M60 I20 vs Audi e-tron GT quattro: which is cheaper to run?

What each kilometre costs, depending on your driving profile and how you charge. Annual projection and cumulative savings over 10 years.

luxury SUV · 2022 vs 2026 · 15,000 km/an · Mixed · Home 0.20 €/kWh · Methodology
Annual mileage
15,000 km
5,000 km50,000 km
Driving mix

30 % City · 50 % Road · 20 % Motorway

Charging type

Result · yearly energy cost

ABMW iX M60 I20

727 €per year

24,2 kWh/100 km weighted · 4.85 € per 100 km · 3 635 kWh per year

Gap346 € per yearin favour of the e-tron GT quattro (−48 %)≈ 160 L petrol 95
BAudi e-tron GT quattro

381 €per year

12,7 kWh/100 km weighted · 2.54 € per 100 km · 1 903 kWh per year

The verdict changes with your usage
ProfileSplitAA · iXBB · e-tronGap
City70 / 25 / 570 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway619 €324 €295 € · e-tron
Mixed30 / 50 / 2030 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway727 €381 €346 € · e-tron
Long-distance10 / 40 / 5010 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway860 €450 €410 € · e-tron

Cumulative saving for the e-tron GT quattro

1 year
346 €
3 years
1,039 €
5 years
1,732 €
10 years
3,465 €

Energy only. Excludes purchase, insurance, servicing, depreciation.

What produces these figures

WLTP combined
23.3 kWh/100 km · 12.2 L/100 km
Powertrain
Fully electric · Fully electric
Power
619 ch · 577 ch
Kerb weight
2,640 kg · 2,280 kg

Other similar comparisons

BMWVSMercedes

iX M60 vs AMG G 63

gap 5 833 €/year
PorscheVSAudi

Taycan GTS vs e-tron GT quattro

gap 406 €/year
BMWVSMercedes

iX M60 vs AMG G 63

gap 5 833 €/year
PorscheVSAudi

Taycan GTS Sport Turismo vs e-tron GT quattro

gap 436 €/year

Frequently asked questions

On a 100 km mixed trip, the Audi e-tron GT quattro is about 50% cheaper than the BMW iX M60 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.

Audi e-tron GT quattro offers more range: 574 km vs 566 km for BMW iX M60 (WLTP/EPA). In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.

The Audi e-tron GT quattro is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.