On a 100 km mixed trip, the Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 is about 85% cheaper than the Ford Explorer ST 400 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
509 €per year
17,0 kWh/100 km weighted · 3.39 € per 100 km · 2 543 kWh per year
| Profile | Split | Explorer | Scenic | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | 70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway | 4,394 € | 433 € | 3,961 € · Scenic |
| Mixed | 30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway | 3,809 € | 509 € | 3,300 € · Scenic |
| Long-distance | 10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway | 3,351 € | 602 € | 2,750 € · Scenic |
Cumulative saving for the Scenic E-Tech Electric 170
Energy only. Excludes purchase, insurance, servicing, depreciation.
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 is about 85% cheaper than the Ford Explorer ST 400 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
The declared range of the Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 is 430 km (WLTP/EPA). In real-world conditions, expect 10-20% less.
The Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.