On a 100 km mixed trip, the Peugeot e-308 and Renault Megane E-Tech Electric 130 have a near-identical cost per km with default parameters. The gap becomes significant once you enter your actual energy prices.
Consumption comparison
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
474 €per year
15,8 kWh/100 km weighted · 3,16 € per 100 km · 2 371 kWh per year
Annual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Charging type
| Profile | Split | e-308 | Megane | Gap | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | 70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway | 520 € | 404 € | 117 € | Megane |
| Mixed | 30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway | 469 € | 474 € | 5 € | Nearly level |
| Long-distance | 10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway | 433 € | 561 € | 129 € | e-308 |
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Peugeot e-308 and Renault Megane E-Tech Electric 130 have a near-identical cost per km with default parameters. The gap becomes significant once you enter your actual energy prices.
Peugeot e-308 offers more range: 415 km vs 300 km for Renault Megane E-Tech Electric 130 (WLTP/EPA). In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.
The Peugeot e-308 is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.