On a 100 km mixed trip, the Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 is about 65% cheaper than the Ford Puma EcoBoost 125 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Consumption comparison
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
509 €per year
17,0 kWh/100 km weighted · 3,39 € per 100 km · 2 543 kWh per year
Cheaper to runAnnual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Charging type
Fuel price
Petrol 95 : 2,03 €/L·Diesel : 2,25 €/L
prix-carburants.gouv.fr — moyenne nationale du 25/08/2026 ; EDF Tarif Bleu Base au 01/08/2026 ; DC autoroute : moyenne des réseaux sans abonnement
| Profile | Split | Scenic | Puma | Gap | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | 70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway | 433 € | 1 456 € | 1 023 € | Scenic |
| Mixed | 30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway | 509 € | 1 357 € | 848 € | Scenic |
| Long-distance | 10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway | 602 € | 1 287 € | 685 € | Scenic |
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 is about 65% cheaper than the Ford Puma EcoBoost 125 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
The declared range of the Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 is 430 km (WLTP/EPA). In real-world conditions, expect 10-20% less.
The Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 170 is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.