On a 100 km mixed trip, the Alpine A290 GT 160kW is about 35% cheaper than the Tesla Model S 85 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
What each kilometre costs, depending on your driving profile and how you charge. Annual projection and cumulative savings over 10 years.
| Profile | Split | AA · Model | BB · A290 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| City70 / 25 / 5 | 70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway | 682 € | 436 € | 246 € · A290 |
| Mixed30 / 50 / 20 | 30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway | 702 € | 456 € | 246 € · A290 |
| Long-distance10 / 40 / 50 | 10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway | 719 € | 474 € | 246 € · A290 |
Cumulative saving for the A290 GT 160kW
Energy only. Excludes purchase, insurance, servicing, depreciation.
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Alpine A290 GT 160kW is about 35% cheaper than the Tesla Model S 85 with default parameters. This ratio shifts with your actual energy prices - simulate for your profile.
Tesla Model S 85 offers more range: 426 km vs 380 km for Alpine A290 GT 160kW (WLTP/EPA). In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.
The Alpine A290 GT 160kW is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.