Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /Sedans
AModelvsBA290BEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsModel · A290

Tesla Model S 85 vs Alpine A290 GT 160kW: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

grand tourer · 2012 vs 2024 · Methodology
TeslaBEVFaster

Model S 85

362 hp · 599 Nm · 2,108 kg · 2012

VS
AlpineBEV

A290 GT 160kW

218 hp · 300 Nm · 1,479 kg · 2024

Result · 0–100 km/h

ATesla Model S 85

5.75 s

Gap0.61 sin favour of Model S 85
BAlpine A290 GT 160kW

6.36 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureModel S 85A290 GT 160kWGap
0–100 km/h5.75 s6.36 s0.61 s · Model S 85
400 m standing start13.94 s14.65 s0.71 s · Model S 85
1,000 m standing start25.17 s26.75 s1.58 s · Model S 85
Top speed (electronically limited)201 km/h232 km/h31 km/h · A290 GT 160kW
Power-to-weight ratio5.82 kg/hp6.78 kg/hpbetter ratio · Model S 85

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

TeslaBEVModel S 85
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
AlpineBEVA290 GT 160kW
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageModel S 85A290 GT 160kW
0–30 km/h1.67 s · tight gap1.76 s
0–50 km/h2.78 s2.94 s
0–80 km/h4.46 s4.77 s
0–100 km/h5.75 s6.36 s
0–120 km/h7.39 s8.43 s
0–160 km/h12.43 s15.30 s
0–200 km/h20.22 s29.20 s
400 m standing start13.94 s14.65 s
1,000 m standing start25.17 s26.75 s
Top speed201 km/h232 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Tesla

Model S 85

5,82kg/hpratio better by 0,96 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power362 hpPermanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
Torque599 Nm
Weight2 108 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainPropulsion
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear
Alpine

A290 GT 160kW

6,78kg/hpcompensated by −629 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power218 hpPending
Torque300 Nm
Weight1 479 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
Drivetrain-
Gearboxsingle-speed reduction

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Model S 85 hits 100 km/h in 5.75 s versus 6.36 s for the A290 GT 160kW. At this point, the Model S 85 leads by 0.61 s and sits roughly 5 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the Model S 85 is doing 137 km/h against 129 km/h for the A290 GT 160kW. The gap is 0.39 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the Model S 85 crosses the line in 13.94 s versus 14.65 s. The 0.71 s gap represents roughly 31 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the Model S 85 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 190 km/h versus 174 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model S 85 finishes in 25.17 s versus 26.75 s, with a 1.58 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (232 km/h), the A290 GT 160kW never recovers its launch deficit.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Electronically capped at 201 km/h, the Model S 85 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.

With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.82 kg/hp vs 6.78 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.74 seconds. The 0.61 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSTesla

A6 Avant e-tron vs Model S 85

BMWVSTesla

i5 xDrive40 vs Model S 85

BMWVSTesla

i5 xDrive40 Touring vs Model S 85

PorscheVSTesla

Taycan vs Model S 85

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, Model S 85 wins (5,75 s vs 6,36 s).

Model S 85 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,75 seconds (calibrated simulation).

Model S 85: 362 hp, ratio 5,82 kg/hp. A290 GT 160kW: 218 hp, ratio 6,78 kg/hp.

Model S 85: 201 km/h. A290 GT 160kW: 232 km/h.