On a 100 km mixed trip, the Volvo EX40 Single Motor and Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 have a near-identical cost per km with default parameters. The gap becomes significant once you enter your actual energy prices.
Consumption comparison
Same car, two powertrains. The simulator below calculates the gap based on your mileage and charging type.
518 €per year
17,3 kWh/100 km weighted · 3,45 € per 100 km · 2 590 kWh per year
Cheaper to runAnnual mileage
15 000 km/an
Simulated driving mix
Drag anywhere on the bar to adjust
Charging type
| Profile | Split | EX40 | Scenic | Gap | Advantage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| City | 70 % city · 25 % road · 5 % motorway | 529 € | 441 € | 88 € | Scenic |
| Mixed | 30 % city · 50 % road · 20 % motorway | 554 € | 518 € | 36 € | Scenic |
| Long-distance | 10 % city · 40 % road · 50 % motorway | 576 € | 613 € | 37 € | EX40 |
On a 100 km mixed trip, the Volvo EX40 Single Motor and Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 have a near-identical cost per km with default parameters. The gap becomes significant once you enter your actual energy prices.
Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 offers more range: 620 km vs 370 km for Volvo EX40 Single Motor (WLTP/EPA). In real motorway use, expect 10-20% less depending on temperature.
The Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 is cheaper across all distances with default rates. If your energy prices differ significantly, simulate to see the real impact on your budget.