Among the 14 C-SUV electric 2022–2026, the EX40 Single Motor ranks 13th of 14 in WLTP range (370 km, behind the Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220), 8th of 14 in 0–100 km/h (7.3 s, behind the Volvo XC40 Recharge Twin AWD).
I · GENERATION 2024 → · COMPACT SUV
VolvoBEV
EX40 Single Motor
231 hp, 370 km range, 7,3 s 0-100 : among the 14 C-SUV electric 2022–2026, the EX40 Single Motor ranks 13th of 14 in WLTP range, 8th of 14 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
231hp
330 Nm · 231 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
7.3s
VMax 180 km/h
Range
370km
WLTP
DC charging
—kW
Technical identity card
Full specifications Volvo EX40 Single Motor
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Puissance électrique | 231 hp |
| Combined power | 231 hp |
| Couple | 330 Nm |
| Gearbox | Mono-rapport Automatique |
Battery and charging
| Battery capacity | 79 kWh |
| Range WLTP | 370 km |
| Conso élec WLTP | 18.6 kWh/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 7,3 s |
| VMax | 180 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Kerb weight | 2,040 kg |
| Cd | 0.32 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 14 C-SUV electric, the EX40 Single Motor ranks (in the bottom third) in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Real-world range: 370 km WLTP (13th of 14 in WLTP range)
The EX40 Single Motor offers 370 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 (620 km).
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Autonomie réelle
Simulez l’autonomie selon la vitesse, la température et le style.
Simuler l’autonomie →Segment positioning
Where the EX40 Single Motor stands against C-SUV electric
Comparison across 14 C-SUV electric marketed between 2022–2026.
WLTP range13e / 14
370 km
Min 340 km · Volvo EX40 Twin Motor AWDMax 620 km · Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220
0–100 km/h8e / 14
7,3 s
Min 8,7 s · Peugeot E-3008 210Max 4,9 s · Volvo XC40 Recharge Twin AWD
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Q4 40 e-tron 150 kW201 hp · 0-100 8.5 s
Q4 Sportback 40 e-tron 150 kW201 hp · 0-100 8.5 s
Q4 45 e-tron 210 kW286 hp · 0-100 6.7 s
Q4 45 e-tron quattro 210 kW286 hp · 0-100 6.6 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Volvo EX40 I range
Generation I launched in 2020. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the I
Compare
Popular duels involving the EX40 Single Motor
Frequently asked questions
Volvo EX40 Single Motor: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
370 km WLTP announced — making it the 13th of 14 in autonomie du segment out of 14 models. The reference is the Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 (620 km).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 leads in WLTP range (620 km vs 370 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the EX40 Single Motor vs Renault Scenic E-Tech Electric 220 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.