Over 0–100 km/h, e-tron GT quattro wins (4,14 s vs 4,51 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | e-tron GT quattro | M240i F22 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4.14 s | 4.51 s | 0.38 s · e-tron GT quattro |
| 400 m standing start | 12.36 s | 12.59 s | 0.23 s · e-tron GT quattro |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22.46 s | 22.59 s | 0.13 s · e-tron GT quattro |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 245 km/h | 250 km/h | 5 km/h · M240i F22 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3.95 kg/hp | 4.38 kg/hp | better ratio · e-tron GT quattro |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | e-tron GT quattro | M240i F22 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.13 s | 1.42 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1.88 s | 2.29 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3.08 s | 3.51 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4.14 s | 4.51 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5.47 s | 5.79 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 9.25 s | 9.24 s · tight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 14.74 s | 14.33 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12.36 s | 12.59 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22.46 s · tight gap | 22.59 s |
| Top speed limited | 245 km/h | 250 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 577 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 830 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 280 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 490 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
Off the line, the e-tron GT quattro hits 100 km/h in 4.14 s versus 4.52 s for the M240i. The instant torque of 830 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the e-tron GT quattro leads by 0.38 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the e-tron GT quattro is doing 149 km/h against 151 km/h for the M240i. The gap is 0.31 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the e-tron GT quattro crosses the line in 12.36 s versus 12.59 s. The 0.23 s gap represents roughly 12 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The e-tron GT quattro maxes out at 245 km/h while the M240i keeps accelerating towards 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.16 s.
At 1,000 metres, the e-tron GT quattro finishes in 22.46 s versus 22.59 s, with just 0.13 s to spare. The M240i fails to fully close the launch gap.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the e-tron GT quattro is capped at 245 km/h, the M240i at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.51 seconds. The 0.38 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, e-tron GT quattro wins (4,14 s vs 4,51 s).
e-tron GT quattro goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,14 seconds (calibrated simulation).
e-tron GT quattro: 577 hp, ratio 3,95 kg/hp. M240i F22: 340 hp, ratio 4,38 kg/hp.
e-tron GT quattro: 245 km/h. M240i F22: 250 km/h.