Over 0–100 km/h, Q6 SUV e-tron wins (6,82 s vs 7,80 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Q6 SUV e-tron | X2 sDrive20i F39 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,82 s−0,98 s | 7,80 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,01 s−0,73 s | 15,74 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,06 s−1,33 s | 28,39 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 210 km/h | 227 km/h−17 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,28 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,60 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Q6 SUV e-tron | X2 sDrive20i F39 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,93 s | 1,98 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,22 s | 3,30 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,19 s | 5,54 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,82 s | 7,80 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,93 s | 10,42 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,78 s | 18,58 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 28,10 s | 34,95 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,01 s | 15,74 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,06 s | 28,39 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 227 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 302 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 485 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 200 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 192 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 280 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 460 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed Steptronic with double clutch |
Off the line, the Q6 SUV e-tron hits 100 km/h in 6.82 s versus 7.80 s for the Bmw X2 sDrive20i. The instant torque of 485 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Q6 SUV e-tron leads by 0.98 s and sits roughly 5 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Q6 SUV e-tron is doing 128 km/h against 120 km/h for the Bmw X2 sDrive20i. The gap is 0.41 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Q6 SUV e-tron crosses the line in 15.00 s versus 15.74 s. The 0.73 s gap represents roughly 30 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Q6 SUV e-tron continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 174 km/h versus 166 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Q6 SUV e-tron finishes in 27.06 s versus 28.39 s, with a 1.33 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (227 km/h), the Bmw X2 sDrive20i never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Q6 SUV e-tron is capped at 210 km/h, the Bmw X2 sDrive20i at 227 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.09 seconds. The 0.98 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Q6 SUV e-tron wins (6,82 s vs 7,80 s).
Q6 SUV e-tron goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,82 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Q6 SUV e-tron: 302 hp, ratio 7,28 kg/hp. X2 sDrive20i F39: 192 hp, ratio 7,60 kg/hp.
Q6 SUV e-tron: 210 km/h. X2 sDrive20i F39: 227 km/h.