Sur 0–100 km/h, Mustang Mach-E RWD gagne (6,04 s vs 6,82 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Q6 SUV e-tron | Mustang Mach-E RWD | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,82 s | 6,04 s+0,78 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,01 s | 14,39 s+0,62 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,06 s | 26,74 s+0,32 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 210 km/h+30 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,28 kg/hp | 7,01 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Q6 SUV e-tron | Mustang Mach-E RWD |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,93 s | 1,57 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,22 s | 2,63 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,19 s | 4,39 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,82 s | 6,04 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,93 s | 8,18 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,78 s | 14,98 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 28,10 s | — |
| 400 m standing start | 15,01 s | 14,39 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,06 s | 26,74 s |
| Top speed | 210 km/h | 180 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 302 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 485 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 200 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 269 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 430 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 886 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
Off the line, the Mustang Mach-E RWD hits 100 km/h in 6.04 s versus 6.82 s for the Q6 SUV e-tron. At this point, the Mustang Mach-E RWD leads by 0.78 s and sits roughly 14 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Mustang Mach-E RWD is doing 129 km/h against 128 km/h for the Q6 SUV e-tron. The gap is 0.58 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Mustang Mach-E RWD crosses the line in 14.39 s versus 15.00 s. The 0.61 s gap represents roughly 26 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The Mustang Mach-E RWD maxes out at 180 km/h while the Q6 SUV e-tron keeps accelerating towards 210 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.63 s.
At 1,000 metres, the Mustang Mach-E RWD finishes in 26.73 s versus 27.06 s, with just 0.32 s to spare. The Q6 SUV e-tron fails to fully close the launch gap.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Q6 SUV e-tron is capped at 210 km/h, the Mustang Mach-E RWD at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.28 kg/hp vs 7.01 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.26 seconds. The 0.78 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Mustang Mach-E RWD gagne (6,04 s vs 6,82 s).
Q6 SUV e-tron passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,82 secondes (simulation calibrée).
Q6 SUV e-tron : 302 hp, ratio 7,28 kg/hp. Mustang Mach-E RWD : 269 hp, ratio 7,01 kg/hp.
Q6 SUV e-tron : 210 km/h. Mustang Mach-E RWD : 180 km/h.