Over 0–100 km/h, Mustang Mach-E GT wins (3,73 s vs 5,15 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Q7 SUV | Mustang Mach-E GT | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,15 s | 3,73 s+1,42 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,41 s | 12,00 s+1,41 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,35 s | 22,87 s+1,48 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 240 km/h+40 km/h | 200 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,88 kg/hp | 4,33 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Q7 SUV | Mustang Mach-E GT |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,35 s | 1,02 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,26 s | 1,70 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,77 s | 2,78 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,15 s | 3,73 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,87 s | 4,94 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 11,60 s | 8,62 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 19,18 s | 14,27 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,41 s | 12,00 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 24,35 s | 22,87 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 489 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 700 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 385 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 487 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 860 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 108 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
Off the line, the Mustang Mach-E GT hits 100 km/h in 3.73 s versus 5.15 s for the Q7 SUV. At this point, the Mustang Mach-E GT leads by 1.42 s and sits roughly 13 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Mustang Mach-E GT is doing 152 km/h against 139 km/h for the Q7 SUV. The gap is 1.03 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Mustang Mach-E GT crosses the line in 11.99 s versus 13.41 s. The 1.41 s gap represents roughly 66 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Mustang Mach-E GT continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 200 km/h versus 192 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Mustang Mach-E GT finishes in 22.87 s versus 24.35 s, with a 1.47 s lead. Despite a higher top speed (240 km/h), the Q7 SUV never recovers its launch deficit.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Q7 SUV is capped at 240 km/h, the Mustang Mach-E GT at 200 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.88 kg/hp vs 4.33 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.86 seconds. The 1.42 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Mustang Mach-E GT wins (3,73 s vs 5,15 s).
Q7 SUV goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 5,15 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Q7 SUV: 489 hp, ratio 4,88 kg/hp. Mustang Mach-E GT: 487 hp, ratio 4,33 kg/hp.
Q7 SUV: 240 km/h. Mustang Mach-E GT: 200 km/h.