Sur 0–100 km/h, Model Y Performance gagne (3,76 s vs 3,87 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| RS Q8 SUV | Model Y Performance | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,87 s | 3,76 s+0,10 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,88 s−0,14 s | 12,02 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,56 s−0,51 s | 22,07 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,86 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,39 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | RS Q8 SUV | Model Y Performance |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,08 s | 1,03 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,81 s | 1,72 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,90 s | 2,80 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,87 s | 3,76 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,01 s | 4,98 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,12 s | 8,65 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 12,77 s | 14,13 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,88 s | 12,02 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,56 s | 22,07 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 600 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 800 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 315 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 456 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 670 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 003 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Model Y Performance hits 100 km/h in 3.76 s versus 3.87 s for the RS Q8 SUV. The instant torque of 670 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the Model Y Performance leads by 0.10 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Model Y Performance is doing 152 km/h against 156 km/h for the RS Q8 SUV. The gap is 0.02 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the RS Q8 SUV crosses the line in 11.88 s versus 12.01 s. The 0.14 s gap represents roughly 7 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the RS Q8 SUV continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 217 km/h versus 209 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the RS Q8 SUV finishes in 21.56 s versus 22.06 s, with a 0.51 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the RS Q8 SUV and the Model Y Performance are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.73 seconds. The 0.10 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Model Y Performance gagne (3,76 s vs 3,87 s).
RS Q8 SUV passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,87 secondes (simulation calibrée).
RS Q8 SUV : 600 hp, ratio 3,86 kg/hp. Model Y Performance : 456 hp, ratio 4,39 kg/hp.
RS Q8 SUV : 250 km/h. Model Y Performance : 250 km/h.