Sur 0–100 km/h, Model S Long Range gagne (3,29 s vs 3,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| S e-tron GT | Model S Long Range | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,35 s | 3,29 s+0,06 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,51 s | 11,12 s+0,39 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,11 s | 20,17 s+0,94 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 245 km/h | 250 km/h−5 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,47 kg/hp | 3,09 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | S e-tron GT | Model S Long Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,90 s | 0,94 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,50 s | 1,56 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,48 s | 2,51 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,35 s | 3,29 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,46 s | 4,25 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 7,66 s | 6,77 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 12,25 s | 10,23 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,51 s | 11,12 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,11 s | 20,17 s |
| Top speed limited | 245 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 670 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 640 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 325 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 670 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 908 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 069 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Model S Long Range hits 100 km/h in 3.29 s versus 3.36 s for the S e-tron GT. The 0.06 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Model S Long Range is doing 167 km/h against 158 km/h for the S e-tron GT. The gap is 0.13 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the Model S Long Range crosses the line in 11.11 s versus 11.50 s. The 0.39 s gap represents roughly 21 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Model S Long Range continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 236 km/h versus 219 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Model S Long Range finishes in 20.17 s versus 21.11 s, with a 0.94 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (245 vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the S e-tron GT is capped at 245 km/h, the Model S Long Range at 249 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.47 kg/hp vs 3.09 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.14 seconds. The 0.06 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Model S Long Range gagne (3,29 s vs 3,35 s).
S e-tron GT passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 3,35 secondes (simulation calibrée).
S e-tron GT : 670 hp, ratio 3,47 kg/hp. Model S Long Range : 670 hp, ratio 3,09 kg/hp.
S e-tron GT : 245 km/h. Model S Long Range : 250 km/h.