Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /Sedans
AS6BEVvsBM240iPetrol
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsS6 · M240i

Audi S6 Sportback e-tron vs BMW M240i xDrive F22: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

grand tourer · 2026 vs 2018 · Methodology
AudiBEVFaster

S6 Sportback e-tron

543 hp · 855 Nm · 2,325 kg · 2026

VS
BMWPetrol

M240i xDrive F22

340 hp · 500 Nm · 1,540 kg · 2018

Result · 0–100 km/h

AAudi S6 Sportback e-tron

4.08 s

Gap0.38 sin favour of S6 Sportback e-tron
BBMW M240i xDrive F22

4.45 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureS6 Sportback e-tronM240i xDrive F22Gap
0–100 km/h4.08 s4.45 s0.38 s · S6 Sportback e-tron
400 m standing start12.52 s12.67 s0.15 s · S6 Sportback e-tron
1,000 m standing start23.58 s23.03 s0.55 s · M240i xDrive F22
Top speed (electronically limited)233 km/h250 km/h17 km/h · M240i xDrive F22
Power-to-weight ratio4.28 kg/hp4.53 kg/hpbetter ratio · S6 Sportback e-tron

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

AudiBEVS6 Sportback e-tron
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
BMWPetrolM240i xDrive F22
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageS6 Sportback e-tronM240i xDrive F22
0–30 km/h1.11 s · tight gap1.23 s
0–50 km/h1.86 s2.02 s
0–80 km/h3.03 s3.32 s
0–100 km/h4.08 s4.45 s
0–120 km/h5.44 s5.88 s
0–160 km/h10.00 s9.85 s
0–200 km/h19.13 s15.84 s
400 m standing start12.52 s12.67 s
1,000 m standing start23.58 s23.03 s
Top speed limited233 km/h250 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Audi

S6 Sportback e-tron

4,28kg/hpratio better by 0,25 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power543 hpPending
Torque855 Nm
Weight2 325 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxUnknown
BMW

M240i xDrive F22

4,53kg/hpcompensated by −785 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power340 hp6 cyl
Torque500 Nm
Weight1 540 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
Gearbox8-speed Steptronic

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the S6 Sportback e-tron hits 100 km/h in 4.08 s versus 4.45 s for the M240i xDrive. The instant torque of 855 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the S6 Sportback e-tron leads by 0.38 s and sits roughly 5 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the S6 Sportback e-tron is doing 146 km/h against 147 km/h for the M240i xDrive. The gap is 0.24 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the S6 Sportback e-tron crosses the line in 12.52 s versus 12.66 s. The 0.14 s gap represents roughly 7 m of track - barely a car length.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The S6 Sportback e-tron maxes out at 233 km/h while the M240i xDrive keeps accelerating towards 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.04 s.

Around 559 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the M240i xDrive overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 17 km/h higher top speed.

At 1,000 metres, the M240i xDrive finishes in 23.03 s versus 23.58 s. The 0.55 s delta in favour of the M240i xDrive shows that top speed makes a clear difference.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the S6 Sportback e-tron is capped at 240 km/h, the M240i xDrive at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.72 seconds. The 0.38 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSPorsche

S6 Sportback e-tron vs Taycan 4S

BMWVSAudi

M240i xDrive vs S3 Sedan

PorscheVSAudi

Taycan 4S Cross Turismo vs S6 Sportback e-tron

BMWVSAudi

M240i xDrive vs S3 Sportback

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, S6 Sportback e-tron wins (4,08 s vs 4,45 s).

S6 Sportback e-tron goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,08 seconds (calibrated simulation).

S6 Sportback e-tron: 543 hp, ratio 4,28 kg/hp. M240i xDrive F22: 340 hp, ratio 4,53 kg/hp.

S6 Sportback e-tron: 233 km/h. M240i xDrive F22: 250 km/h.