Over 0–100 km/h, SQ7 SUV wins (4,04 s vs 4,37 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | SQ6 SUV e-tron | SQ7 SUV | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4.37 s | 4.04 s | 0.33 s · SQ7 SUV |
| 400 m standing start | 12.70 s | 12.11 s | 0.59 s · SQ7 SUV |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23.29 s | 21.94 s | 1.35 s · SQ7 SUV |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h | 250 km/h | 20 km/h · SQ7 SUV |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4.76 kg/hp | 4.34 kg/hp | better ratio · SQ7 SUV |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | SQ6 SUV e-tron | SQ7 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.16 s | 1.14 s · tight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1.93 s | 1.90 s · tight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3.21 s | 3.07 s · tight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4.37 s | 4.04 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5.84 s | 5.24 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10.17 s | 8.52 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 16.87 s | 13.41 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12.70 s | 12.11 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23.29 s | 21.94 s |
| Top speed limited | 230 km/h | 250 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 509 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 855 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 425 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 770 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 200 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
Off the line, the SQ7 SUV hits 100 km/h in 4.04 s versus 4.37 s for the SQ6 SUV e-tron. Despite lacking instant torque, 507 hp of power compensates. At this point, the SQ7 SUV leads by 0.33 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ7 SUV is doing 154 km/h against 144 km/h for the SQ6 SUV e-tron. The gap is 0.29 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the SQ7 SUV crosses the line in 12.11 s versus 12.70 s. The 0.59 s gap represents roughly 29 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the SQ7 SUV continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 214 km/h versus 198 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the SQ7 SUV finishes in 21.94 s versus 23.29 s, with a 1.35 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the SQ6 SUV e-tron is capped at 230 km/h, the SQ7 SUV at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.73 seconds. The 0.33 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, SQ7 SUV wins (4,04 s vs 4,37 s).
SQ6 SUV e-tron goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,37 seconds (calibrated simulation).
SQ6 SUV e-tron: 509 hp, ratio 4,76 kg/hp. SQ7 SUV: 507 hp, ratio 4,34 kg/hp.
SQ6 SUV e-tron: 230 km/h. SQ7 SUV: 250 km/h.