Over 0–100 km/h, SQ7 SUV and M2 G87 are neck and neck (4,03 s vs 4,12 s, no significant gap).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| SQ7 SUV | M2 G87 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,03 s−0,09 s | 4,12 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,12 s | 12,08 s+0,04 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,97 s | 21,81 s+0,16 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 285 km/h−35 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,47 kg/hp | 3,76 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | SQ7 SUV | M2 G87 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,13 s | 1,17 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,88 s | 1,95 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,05 s | 3,06 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,03 s | 4,12 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,25 s | 5,26 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,57 s | 8,46 stight gap |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,51 s | 13,14 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,12 s | 12,08 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,97 s | 21,81 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 285 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 507 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 770 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 265 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed tiptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 460 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 730 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed M Steptronic |
Off the line, the SQ7 SUV hits 100 km/h in 4.03 s versus 4.12 s for the M2. The 0.09 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the SQ7 SUV is doing 154 km/h against 155 km/h for the M2. The gap is 0.02 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the M2 crosses the line in 12.08 s versus 12.11 s. The 0.03 s gap represents roughly 2 m of track
Past 400 metres, the M2 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 215 km/h versus 213 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the M2 finishes in 21.80 s versus 21.97 s, with a 0.17 s lead.
The SQ7 SUV features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the M2’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the SQ7 SUV is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the M2 at 285 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.47 kg/hp vs 3.76 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.96 seconds. The 0.09 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, SQ7 SUV and M2 G87 are neck and neck (4,03 s vs 4,12 s, no significant gap).
SQ7 SUV goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,03 seconds (calibrated simulation).
SQ7 SUV: 507 hp, ratio 4,47 kg/hp. M2 G87: 460 hp, ratio 3,76 kg/hp.
SQ7 SUV: 250 km/h. M2 G87: 285 km/h.