Over 0–100 km/h, 220d F22 wins (7,29 s vs 7,55 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 220d F22 | 320d Touring G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,29 s−0,26 s | 7,55 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,41 s−0,21 s | 15,62 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,65 s−0,52 s | 28,17 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 230 km/h+1 km/h | 229 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,53 kg/hpbetter ratio | 8,24 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 220d F22 | 320d Touring G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,11 s | 2,05 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,35 s | 3,28 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,41 s | 5,49 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,29 s | 7,55 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 9,70 s | 10,22 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 16,80 s | 18,11 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 30,35 s | 33,26 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,41 s | 15,62 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 27,65 s | 28,17 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h | 229 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 430 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual (8-speed Steptronic) |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 565 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Six-speed manual (Eight-speed Steptronic transmission) |
Off the line, the Bmw 220d hits 100 km/h in 7.29 s versus 7.55 s for the Bmw 320d Touring. The 0.26 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 220d is doing 124 km/h against 121 km/h for the Bmw 320d Touring. The gap is 0.07 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 220d crosses the line in 15.41 s versus 15.61 s. The 0.21 s gap represents roughly 9 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 220d continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 172 km/h versus 167 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 220d finishes in 27.65 s versus 28.17 s, with a 0.52 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (230 vs 229 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Bmw 220d and the Bmw 320d Touring are governed to 230 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.53 kg/hp vs 8.24 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 11.82 seconds. The 0.26 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, 220d F22 wins (7,29 s vs 7,55 s).
220d F22 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,29 seconds (calibrated simulation).
220d F22: 190 hp, ratio 7,53 kg/hp. 320d Touring G20: 190 hp, ratio 8,24 kg/hp.
220d F22: 230 km/h. 320d Touring G20: 229 km/h.