Sur 0–100 km/h, Atto 3 Extended Range gagne (7,41 s vs 7,46 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 320e G20 | Atto 3 Extended Range | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,46 s | 7,41 s+0,05 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,44 s−0,13 s | 15,57 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,77 s−0,43 s | 29,20 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 215 km/h+55 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,65 kg/hp | 8,58 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 320e G20 | Atto 3 Extended Range |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,31 s | 1,96 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,37 s | 3,27 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,96 s | 5,43 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,46 s | 7,41 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,74 s | 10,03 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 20,97 s | 19,03 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 46,63 s | — |
| 400 m standing start | 15,44 s | 15,57 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,77 s | 29,20 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h | 160 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 350 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 765 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | 320e | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 750 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
Off the line, the Atto 3 Extended Range hits 100 km/h in 7.41 s versus 7.46 s for the Bmw 320e. The 0.05 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 320e is doing 115 km/h against 121 km/h for the Atto 3 Extended Range. The gap is 0.39 s. The gap widens compared to the 0-100.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 320e crosses the line in 15.43 s versus 15.57 s. The 0.13 s gap represents roughly 5 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 320e continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 160 km/h versus 158 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 320e finishes in 28.77 s versus 29.19 s, with a 0.43 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw 320e is capped at 220 km/h, the Atto 3 Extended Range at 160 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.65 kg/hp vs 8.58 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.74 seconds. The 0.05 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, Atto 3 Extended Range gagne (7,41 s vs 7,46 s).
320e G20 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 7,46 secondes (simulation calibrée).
320e G20 : 204 hp, ratio 8,65 kg/hp. Atto 3 Extended Range : 204 hp, ratio 8,58 kg/hp.
320e G20 : 215 km/h. Atto 3 Extended Range : 160 km/h.