Sur 0–100 km/h, 330e G20 gagne (5,92 s vs 8,36 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| DS9 E-Tense 250 | 330e G20 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,36 s | 5,92 s+2,44 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,22 s | 14,23 s+1,99 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,57 s | 26,25 s+2,32 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 235 km/h+5 km/h | 230 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,51 kg/hp | 6,90 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | DS9 E-Tense 250 | 330e G20 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,40 s | 1,31 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 4,01 s | 2,22 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6,47 s | 4,15 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,36 s | 5,92 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,88 s | 8,21 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 18,12 s | 14,85 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 31,70 s | 27,58 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,22 s | 14,23 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 28,57 s | 26,25 s |
| Top speed | 235 km/h | 230 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 253 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 520 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 420 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 740 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Bmw 330e hits 100 km/h in 5.92 s versus 8.36 s for the DS9 E-Tense 250. At this point, the Bmw 330e leads by 2.44 s and sits roughly 35 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 330e is doing 128 km/h against 121 km/h for the DS9 E-Tense 250. The gap is 1.77 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 330e crosses the line in 14.23 s versus 16.22 s. The 1.99 s gap represents roughly 81 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 330e continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 175 km/h versus 170 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 330e finishes in 26.25 s versus 28.57 s, with a 2.32 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (235 vs 230 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Electronically capped at 230 km/h, the Bmw 330e never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.51 kg/hp vs 6.90 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.32 seconds. The 2.44 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 330e G20 gagne (5,92 s vs 8,36 s).
DS9 E-Tense 250 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 8,36 secondes (simulation calibrée).
DS9 E-Tense 250 : 253 hp, ratio 7,51 kg/hp. 330e G20 : 252 hp, ratio 6,90 kg/hp.
DS9 E-Tense 250 : 235 km/h. 330e G20 : 230 km/h.