Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /Sedans
A530evsB9PHEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • Specs530e · 9

BMW 530e G30 vs DS9 E-Tense 250: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

grand tourer · 2021 vs 2021 · Methodology
BMWPHEVFaster

530e G30

292 hp · 420 Nm · 1,900 kg · 2021

VS
DSPHEV

9 E-Tense 250

253 hp · 520 Nm · 1,900 kg · 2021

Result · 0–100 km/h

ABMW 530e G30

6.21 s

Gap2.15 sin favour of 530e
BDS9 E-Tense 250

8.36 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
Measure530e G309 E-Tense 250Gap
0–100 km/h6.21 s8.36 s2.15 s · 530e G30
400 m standing start14.42 s16.22 s1.80 s · 530e G30
1,000 m standing start25.93 s28.57 s2.64 s · 530e G30
Top speed (electronically limited)225 km/h235 km/h10 km/h · 9 E-Tense 250
Power-to-weight ratio6.51 kg/hp7.51 kg/hpbetter ratio · 530e G30

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

BMWPHEV530e G30
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
DSPHEV9 E-Tense 250
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
Stage530e G309 E-Tense 250
0–30 km/h1.67 s2.40 s
0–50 km/h2.79 s4.01 s
0–80 km/h4.60 s6.47 s
0–100 km/h6.21 s8.36 s
0–120 km/h8.27 s10.88 s
0–160 km/h14.00 s18.12 s
0–200 km/h23.29 s31.70 s
400 m standing start14.42 s16.22 s
1,000 m standing start25.93 s28.57 s
Top speed225 km/h235 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

BMW

530e G30

6,51kg/hpratio better by 1,00 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power292 hp4 cyl
Torque420 Nm
Weight1 900 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainPropulsion
GearboxEight-speed Steptronic transmission
DS

9 E-Tense 250

7,51kg/hp0
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power253 hpPending
Torque520 Nm
Weight1 900 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
Drivetrain-
Gearbox8-speed automatic

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the 530e hits 100 km/h in 6.21 s versus 8.36 s for the 9 E-Tense 250. At this point, the 530e leads by 2.15 s and sits roughly 27 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the 530e is doing 130 km/h against 121 km/h for the 9 E-Tense 250. The gap is 1.45 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the 530e crosses the line in 14.41 s versus 16.22 s. The 1.80 s gap represents roughly 74 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the 530e continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 182 km/h versus 170 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 530e finishes in 25.92 s versus 28.57 s, with a 2.64 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (225 vs 235 km/h), preventing any comeback.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Electronically capped at 225 km/h, the 530e never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.

With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (6.51 kg/hp vs 7.51 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.32 seconds. The 2.15 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of 530e G30
BMW 530e iPerformanceBMW 530e iPerformance
Instead of 9 E-Tense 250
Audi A6 Sedan e-hybrid quattro S tronic 220 kW

Other duels you might be interested in

AudiVSBMW

A6 Avant e-hybrid quattro S tronic 220 kW vs 530e

DS9VSBMW

E-Tense 250 vs 530e iPerformance

AudiVSBMW

A6 Sedan e-hybrid quattro S tronic 220 kW vs 530e

DS9VSBMW

E-Tense 250 vs 530e iPerformance

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, 530e G30 wins (6,21 s vs 8,36 s).

530e G30 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,21 seconds (calibrated simulation).

530e G30: 292 hp, ratio 6,51 kg/hp. 9 E-Tense 250: 253 hp, ratio 7,51 kg/hp.

530e G30: 225 km/h. 9 E-Tense 250: 235 km/h.