Sur 0–100 km/h, 740Le iPerformance G11 gagne (5,58 s vs 8,36 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 740Le iPerformance G11 | DS9 E-Tense 250 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 5,58 s−2,78 s | 8,36 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,77 s−2,45 s | 16,22 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,05 s−3,52 s | 28,57 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+15 km/h | 235 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,95 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,51 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 740Le iPerformance G11 | DS9 E-Tense 250 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,29 s | 2,40 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,14 s | 4,01 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,85 s | 6,47 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 5,58 s | 8,36 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,52 s | 10,88 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 12,85 s | 18,12 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 21,11 s | 31,70 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,77 s | 16,22 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,05 s | 28,57 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 235 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 326 hp | 4 cyl |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 940 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 253 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 520 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 900 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | — | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
Off the line, the Bmw 740Le iPerformance hits 100 km/h in 5.58 s versus 8.36 s for the DS9 E-Tense 250. At this point, the Bmw 740Le iPerformance leads by 2.78 s and sits roughly 36 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw 740Le iPerformance is doing 132 km/h against 121 km/h for the DS9 E-Tense 250. The gap is 2.01 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw 740Le iPerformance crosses the line in 13.77 s versus 16.22 s. The 2.45 s gap represents roughly 99 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw 740Le iPerformance continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 186 km/h versus 170 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw 740Le iPerformance finishes in 25.05 s versus 28.57 s, with a 3.52 s lead.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h, the Bmw 740Le iPerformance never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor — it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.95 kg/hp vs 7.51 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.32 seconds. The 2.78 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 740Le iPerformance G11 gagne (5,58 s vs 8,36 s).
740Le iPerformance G11 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 5,58 secondes (simulation calibrée).
740Le iPerformance G11 : 326 hp, ratio 5,95 kg/hp. DS9 E-Tense 250 : 253 hp, ratio 7,51 kg/hp.
740Le iPerformance G11 : 250 km/h. DS9 E-Tense 250 : 235 km/h.