Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /Hatchbacks
Ai3svsBe-208BEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • Specsi3s · e-208

BMW i3s I01 vs Peugeot e-208 156 Phase 2: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

compact · 2018 vs 2025 · Methodology
BMWBEVFaster

i3s I01

184 hp · 270 Nm · 1,290 kg · 2018

VS
PeugeotBEV

e-208 156 Phase 2

156 hp · 260 Nm · 1,455 kg · 2025

Result · 0–100 km/h

ABMW i3s I01

6.81 s

Gap1.31 sin favour of i3s
BPeugeot e-208 156 Phase 2

8.12 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
Measurei3s I01e-208 156 Phase 2Gap
0–100 km/h6.81 s8.12 s1.31 s · i3s I01
400 m standing start15.05 s16.14 s1.09 s · i3s I01
1,000 m standing start28.59 s30.57 s1.98 s · i3s I01
Top speed (electronically limited)160 km/h150 km/h10 km/h · i3s I01
Power-to-weight ratio7.01 kg/hp9.33 kg/hpbetter ratio · i3s I01

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

BMWBEVi3s I01
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
PeugeotBEVe-208 156 Phase 2
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
Stagei3s I01e-208 156 Phase 2
0–30 km/h1.77 s2.21 s
0–50 km/h2.96 s3.69 s
0–80 km/h4.95 s6.03 s
0–100 km/h6.81 s8.12 s
0–120 km/h9.25 s10.92 s
0–160 km/h16.98 s-
400 m standing start15.05 s16.14 s
1,000 m standing start28.59 s30.57 s
Top speed160 km/h150 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

BMW

i3s I01

7,01kg/hpratio better by 2,32 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power184 hpPending
Torque270 Nm
Weight1 290 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainPropulsion
GearboxAutomatic, single-speed with fixed ratio (9.665:1)
Peugeot

e-208 156 Phase 2

9,33kg/hpcompensated by −165 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power156 hpSynchrone a aimants permanents 115 kW
Torque260 Nm
Weight1 455 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainTraction
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the i3s hits 100 km/h in 6.81 s versus 8.12 s for the e-208 156 Phase 2. At this point, the i3s leads by 1.31 s and sits roughly 17 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the i3s is doing 124 km/h against 119 km/h for the e-208 156 Phase 2. The gap is 0.84 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the i3s crosses the line in 15.05 s versus 16.14 s. The 1.10 s gap represents roughly 43 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the i3s continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 160 km/h versus 150 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the i3s finishes in 28.59 s versus 30.57 s, with a 1.98 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (160 vs 150 km/h), preventing any comeback.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the i3s is capped at 160 km/h, the e-208 156 Phase 2 at 150 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.01 kg/hp vs 9.33 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 12.76 seconds. The 1.31 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Compare with other alternatives

Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.

Instead of i3s I01
MINI Cooper SE FWDMINI Cooper E FWDRenault 5 E-Tech Electric 150
Instead of e-208 156 Phase 2
Nissan Leaf 40kWh ZE1Citroen ë-C4 FWDRenault Megane E-Tech Electric 130

Other duels you might be interested in

VolkswagenVSBMW

ID.3 Pro vs i3s

PeugeotVSRenault

e-208 156 Phase 2 vs 5 E-Tech Electric 150

VolkswagenVSBMW

ID.3 Pro S vs i3s

BMWVSPeugeot

i3 vs e-208 156 Phase 2

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, i3s I01 wins (6,81 s vs 8,12 s).

i3s I01 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,81 seconds (calibrated simulation).

i3s I01: 184 hp, ratio 7,01 kg/hp. e-208 156 Phase 2: 156 hp, ratio 9,33 kg/hp.

i3s I01: 160 km/h. e-208 156 Phase 2: 150 km/h.