Over 0–100 km/h, F-TYPE P300 wins (5,63 s vs 6,12 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
| Measure | i5 eDrive40 G60 | F-TYPE P300 | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6.12 s | 5.63 s | 0.50 s · F-TYPE P300 |
| 400 m standing start | 14.30 s | 13.69 s | 0.61 s · F-TYPE P300 |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25.87 s | 24.35 s | 1.52 s · F-TYPE P300 |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 193 km/h | 250 km/h | 57 km/h · F-TYPE P300 |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6.81 kg/hp | 5.32 kg/hp | better ratio · F-TYPE P300 |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
| Stage | i5 eDrive40 G60 | F-TYPE P300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1.79 s | 1.61 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2.98 s | 2.69 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4.78 s | 4.30 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6.12 s | 5.63 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7.84 s | 7.17 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13.27 s | 11.54 s |
| 0–200 km/h | - | 18.21 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14.30 s | 13.69 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25.87 s | 24.35 s |
| Top speed limited | 193 km/h | 250 km/h |
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 130 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-stage with fixed ratio |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 595 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
Off the line, the F-TYPE P300 hits 100 km/h in 5.63 s versus 6.12 s for the i5 eDrive40. Despite lacking instant torque, 300 hp of power compensates. At this point, the F-TYPE P300 leads by 0.50 s and sits roughly 7 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the F-TYPE P300 is doing 140 km/h against 135 km/h for the i5 eDrive40. The gap is 0.38 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the F-TYPE P300 crosses the line in 13.69 s versus 14.29 s. The 0.60 s gap represents roughly 28 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the F-TYPE P300 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 197 km/h versus 186 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the F-TYPE P300 finishes in 24.35 s versus 25.87 s, with a 1.52 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the i5 eDrive40 is capped at 193 km/h, the F-TYPE P300 at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.92 seconds. The 0.50 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, F-TYPE P300 wins (5,63 s vs 6,12 s).
i5 eDrive40 G60 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,12 seconds (calibrated simulation).
i5 eDrive40 G60: 313 hp, ratio 6,81 kg/hp. F-TYPE P300: 300 hp, ratio 5,32 kg/hp.
i5 eDrive40 G60: 193 km/h. F-TYPE P300: 250 km/h.