Over 0–100 km/h, i5 eDrive40 G60 wins (6,12 s vs 6,35 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| i5 eDrive40 G60 | Yaris GRMN | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,12 s−0,23 s | 6,35 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,30 s−0,18 s | 14,48 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,87 s−0,14 s | 26,01 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 193 km/h | 235 km/h−42 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 6,81 kg/hp | 5,35 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | i5 eDrive40 G60 | Yaris GRMN |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,79 s | 1,81 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,98 s | 3,02 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,78 s | 4,82 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,12 s | 6,35 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 7,84 s | 8,26 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 13,27 s | 13,82 s |
| 0–200 km/h | - | 24,32 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,30 s | 14,48 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 25,87 s | 26,01 stight gap |
| Top speed | 193 km/h | 235 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 313 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 130 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Automatic transmission, single-stage with fixed ratio |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 212 hp | I4 |
| Torque | 250 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 135 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Manual 6-speed |
Off the line, the i5 eDrive40 hits 100 km/h in 6.12 s versus 6.35 s for the Yaris GRMN. The instant torque of 400 Nm from the electric motor makes the difference. At this point, the i5 eDrive40 leads by 0.23 s and sits roughly 2 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the i5 eDrive40 is doing 135 km/h against 133 km/h for the Yaris GRMN. The gap is 0.13 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the i5 eDrive40 crosses the line in 14.29 s versus 14.48 s. The 0.19 s gap represents roughly 9 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The i5 eDrive40 maxes out at 193 km/h while the Yaris GRMN keeps accelerating towards 235 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.24 s.
At 1,000 metres, the i5 eDrive40 finishes in 25.87 s versus 26.00 s, with just 0.14 s to spare. The Yaris GRMN fails to fully close the launch gap.
Electronically capped at 193 km/h, the i5 eDrive40 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.32 seconds. The 0.23 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, i5 eDrive40 G60 wins (6,12 s vs 6,35 s).
i5 eDrive40 G60 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 6,12 seconds (calibrated simulation).
i5 eDrive40 G60: 313 hp, ratio 6,81 kg/hp. Yaris GRMN: 212 hp, ratio 5,35 kg/hp.
i5 eDrive40 G60: 193 km/h. Yaris GRMN: 235 km/h.