Over 0–100 km/h, P7 wins (4,21 s vs 4,69 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| iX xDrive50 I20 | P7 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,69 s | 4,21 s+0,47 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,93 s | 12,55 s+0,38 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,92 s−1,33 s | 25,25 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 200 km/h+30 km/h | 170 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,94 kg/hp | 4,81 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | iX xDrive50 I20 | P7 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,29 s | 1,11 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,15 s | 1,85 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,50 s | 3,09 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,69 s | 4,21 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,18 s | 5,64 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,39 s | 9,67 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 16,61 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 12,93 s | 12,55 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,92 s | 25,25 s |
| Top speed | 200 km/h | 170 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 523 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 765 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 585 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 424 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 655 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the P7 hits 100 km/h in 4.22 s versus 4.69 s for the iX xDrive50. At this point, the P7 leads by 0.47 s and sits roughly 7 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the P7 is doing 147 km/h against 144 km/h for the iX xDrive50. The gap is 0.36 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the P7 crosses the line in 12.54 s versus 12.93 s. The 0.38 s gap represents roughly 19 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The P7 maxes out at 170 km/h while the iX xDrive50 keeps accelerating towards 200 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.06 s.
Around 582 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the iX xDrive50 overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 30 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the iX xDrive50 finishes in 23.92 s versus 25.24 s. The 1.33 s delta in favour of the iX xDrive50 shows that top speed makes a clear difference.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the iX xDrive50 is capped at 200 km/h, the P7 at 170 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.94 kg/hp vs 4.81 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 7.07 seconds. The 0.47 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, P7 wins (4,21 s vs 4,69 s).
iX xDrive50 I20 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,69 seconds (calibrated simulation).
iX xDrive50 I20: 523 hp, ratio 4,94 kg/hp. P7: 424 hp, ratio 4,81 kg/hp.
iX xDrive50 I20: 200 km/h. P7: 170 km/h.