Sur 0–100 km/h, M2 G87 gagne (4,12 s vs 4,24 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M2 G87 | 718 Cayman GT4 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,12 s−0,12 s | 4,24 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,08 s | 12,02 s+0,06 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,81 s | 21,46 s+0,35 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 285 km/h | 303 km/h−18 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,76 kg/hp | 3,45 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M2 G87 | 718 Cayman GT4 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,17 s | 1,10 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,95 s | 1,84 stight gap |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,06 s | 3,26 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,12 s | 4,24 stight gap |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,26 s | 5,23 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,46 s | 8,26 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,14 s | 12,40 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,08 s | 12,02 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,81 s | 21,46 s |
| Top speed | 285 km/h | 303 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 460 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 730 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed M Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 420 hp | B6 |
| Torque | 420 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 451 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | MANUAL |
Off the line, the M2 hits 100 km/h in 4.12 s versus 4.24 s for the 718 Cayman GT4. The 0.12 s gap is negligible: both vehicles are neck and neck.
At 200 metres, the M2 is doing 155 km/h against 156 km/h for the 718 Cayman GT4. The gap is 0.00 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 718 Cayman GT4 crosses the line in 12.02 s versus 12.08 s. The 0.06 s gap represents roughly 3 m of track — barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the 718 Cayman GT4 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 224 km/h versus 215 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 718 Cayman GT4 finishes in 21.46 s versus 21.80 s, with a 0.34 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the M2 is capped at 285 km/h, the 718 Cayman GT4 at 303 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.76 kg/hp vs 3.45 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Manual).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 5.94 seconds. The 0.12 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, M2 G87 gagne (4,12 s vs 4,24 s).
M2 G87 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,12 secondes (simulation calibrée).
M2 G87 : 460 hp, ratio 3,76 kg/hp. 718 Cayman GT4 : 420 hp, ratio 3,45 kg/hp.
M2 G87 : 285 km/h. 718 Cayman GT4 : 303 km/h.