Among the 46 S 2018–2022, the 718 Cayman GT4 ranks 37th of 46 in 0–100 km/h (4.3 s, behind the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ), 28th of 46 in Top speed (303 km/h, behind the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ), 25th of 46 in Power-to-weight (289 hp/t, behind the Lamborghini Aventador SVJ).
718 · GENERATION 2020 → · SPORTS CAR
PorscheICE
718 Cayman GT4
420 hp, 4,3 s 0-100 : among the 46 S 2018–2022, the 718 Cayman GT4 ranks 37th of 46 in 0–100 km/h, 28th of 46 in Top speed, 25th of 46 in Power-to-weight, behind the only Lamborghini Aventador SVJ. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
420hp
420 Nm
0 → 100 km/h
4.3s
VMax 303 km/h
Cons.
11.0L
/100 km
Tank
63.973429L
Technical identity card
Full specifications Porsche 718 Cayman GT4
Manufacturer data. Consumption and range estimated from the WLTP cycle; performance simulated by the Caralogy physics engine.
Powertrain
| Architecture | Boxer · 6 cyl. · Atmosphérique |
| Displacement | 3,995 cm³ |
| Puissance thermique | 420 hp |
| Combined power | 420 hp |
| Combined torque | 420 Nm |
| Gearbox | Manuelle 6 rapports Manuelle |
| Transmission | Propulsion |
Consumption
| Cons. WLTP | 11.0 L/100km |
| Tank | 63.973429 L |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 4,3 s |
| VMax | 303 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,458 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,484 mm |
| Width | 1,803 mm |
| Height | 1,270 mm |
| Boot | 10 L |
| Kerb weight | 1,451 kg |
| Cd | 0.34 |
Caralogy Methodology
Performance (0-100, top speed) simulated by the Caralogy physics engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves). Motorway consumption values estimated from the manufacturer WLTP cycle.
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · WLTP-estimated consumption · Caralogy-simulated performance
Among the 46 S, the 718 Cayman GT4 ranks (in the bottom third) in acceleration. Caralogy simulates its real-world performance: motorway simulation, performance simulation and consumption simulation.
Caralogy Analysis
Tailored to this vehicle?
Acceleration: 4.3 s 0-100 (37th of 46 in 0–100 km/h)
In pure acceleration, the 718 Cayman GT4 ranks 37th of 46 in 0–100 km/h, 1.5 s off the reference Lamborghini Aventador SVJ (2.8 s).
Top speed: 303 km/h (28th of 46 in Top speed)
Top speed of 303 km/h. The segment reference reaches 350 km/h.
Go beyond this analysis
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Segment positioning
Where the 718 Cayman GT4 stands against S
Comparison across 46 S marketed between 2018–2022.
0–100 km/h37e / 46
4,3 s
Min 5,7 s · Jaguar F-TYPE P300Max 2,8 s · Lamborghini Aventador SVJ
Top speed28e / 46
303 km/h
Min 250 km/h · Toyota GR Supra 3.0Max 350 km/h · Lamborghini Aventador SVJ
Power-to-weight25e / 46
289 hp/t
Min 188 hp/t · Jaguar F-TYPE P300Max 505 hp/t · Lamborghini Aventador SVJ
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Z4 M40i340 hp · 0-100 4.5 s
Z4 M40i340 hp · 0-100 4.5 s
F-TYPE P300300 hp · 0-100 5.7 s
F-TYPE R P575575 hp · 0-100 3.7 s
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
Model family
The full Porsche Cayman 718 range
Generation 718 launched in 2017. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the 718
Compare
Popular duels involving the 718 Cayman GT4
Frequently asked questions
Porsche 718 Cayman GT4: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Lamborghini Aventador SVJ leads in 0–100 km/h (2.8 s vs 4.3 s). The choice depends on your priorities: check the 718 Cayman GT4 vs Lamborghini Aventador SVJ duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.