Sur 0–100 km/h, M2 Competition F87 gagne (4,42 s vs 5,63 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M2 Competition F87 | F-TYPE P300 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,42 s−1,20 s | 5,63 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,30 s−1,39 s | 13,69 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,97 s−2,38 s | 24,35 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,77 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,32 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M2 Competition F87 | F-TYPE P300 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,33 s | 1,61 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,22 s | 2,69 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,53 s | 4,30 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,42 s | 5,63 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,56 s | 7,17 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,53 s | 11,54 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,00 s | 18,21 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,30 s | 13,69 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 21,97 s | 24,35 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 411 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 550 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | M2 Competition | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 300 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 400 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 595 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | F-TYPE P300 2022 | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic ZF |
Off the line, the Bmw M2 Competition hits 100 km/h in 4.43 s versus 5.63 s for the F-TYPE P300. At this point, the Bmw M2 Competition leads by 1.20 s and sits roughly 11 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M2 Competition is doing 157 km/h against 140 km/h for the F-TYPE P300. The gap is 0.92 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M2 Competition crosses the line in 12.30 s versus 13.69 s. The 1.39 s gap represents roughly 66 m of track — a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M2 Competition continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 218 km/h versus 197 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M2 Competition finishes in 21.96 s versus 24.35 s, with a 2.39 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Bmw M2 Competition and the F-TYPE P300 are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph — industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.77 kg/hp vs 5.32 kg/hp) and transmission (Manual vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 8.14 seconds. The 1.20 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, M2 Competition F87 gagne (4,42 s vs 5,63 s).
M2 Competition F87 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 4,42 secondes (simulation calibrée).
M2 Competition F87 : 411 hp, ratio 3,77 kg/hp. F-TYPE P300 : 300 hp, ratio 5,32 kg/hp.
M2 Competition F87 : 250 km/h. F-TYPE P300 : 250 km/h.