Over 0–100 km/h, SQ5 SUV wins (4,42 s vs 4,69 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M4 Convertible F82 | SQ5 SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,69 s | 4,42 s+0,27 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,65 s−0,11 s | 12,76 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,52 s−0,98 s | 23,50 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 4,15 kg/hpbetter ratio | 5,56 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M4 Convertible F82 | SQ5 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,38 s | 1,06 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,29 s | 1,78 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,63 s | 3,15 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,69 s | 4,42 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,96 s | 6,02 stight gap |
| 0–160 km/h | 9,29 s | 10,50 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 14,14 s | 17,55 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,65 s | 12,76 stight gap |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,52 s | 23,50 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 431 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 790 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 6-speed manual (7-speed M Steptronic with double clutch and Drivelogic) |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 367 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 550 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed S tronic |
Off the line, the SQ5 SUV hits 100 km/h in 4.42 s versus 4.69 s for the Bmw M4 Convertible. At this point, the SQ5 SUV leads by 0.27 s and sits roughly 10 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the SQ5 SUV is doing 142 km/h against 151 km/h for the Bmw M4 Convertible. The gap is 0.20 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M4 Convertible crosses the line in 12.64 s versus 12.76 s. The 0.11 s gap represents roughly 6 m of track - barely a car length.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M4 Convertible continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 213 km/h versus 196 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M4 Convertible finishes in 22.51 s versus 23.50 s, with a 0.99 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the Bmw M4 Convertible and the SQ5 SUV are governed to 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold - an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (4.15 kg/hp vs 5.56 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.96 seconds. The 0.27 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, SQ5 SUV wins (4,42 s vs 4,69 s).
M4 Convertible F82 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,69 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M4 Convertible F82: 431 hp, ratio 4,15 kg/hp. SQ5 SUV: 367 hp, ratio 5,56 kg/hp.
M4 Convertible F82: 250 km/h. SQ5 SUV: 250 km/h.