Over 0–100 km/h, M5 Competition F90 wins (3,34 s vs 4,14 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| M5 Competition F90 | e-tron GT quattro | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,34 s−0,80 s | 4,14 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,17 s−1,19 s | 12,36 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,32 s−2,14 s | 22,46 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+5 km/h | 245 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,03 kg/hpbetter ratio | 3,95 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | M5 Competition F90 | e-tron GT quattro |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 0,94 s | 1,13 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,56 s | 1,88 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,48 s | 3,08 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,34 s | 4,14 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 4,29 s | 5,47 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 6,88 s | 9,25 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 10,57 s | 14,74 s |
| 400 m standing start | 11,17 s | 12,36 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 20,32 s | 22,46 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 245 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 625 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 895 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed M Steptronic transmission with Drivelogic, transmission oil cooling |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 577 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 830 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 280 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Unknown |
Off the line, the Bmw M5 Competition hits 100 km/h in 3.34 s versus 4.14 s for the e-tron GT quattro. Despite lacking instant torque, 625 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Bmw M5 Competition leads by 0.80 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Bmw M5 Competition is doing 166 km/h against 149 km/h for the e-tron GT quattro. The gap is 0.75 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Bmw M5 Competition crosses the line in 11.16 s versus 12.36 s. The 1.20 s gap represents roughly 60 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Bmw M5 Competition continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 232 km/h versus 208 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Bmw M5 Competition finishes in 20.32 s versus 22.46 s, with a 2.14 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) vs 245 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Bmw M5 Competition is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the e-tron GT quattro at 245 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.28 seconds. The 0.80 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, M5 Competition F90 wins (3,34 s vs 4,14 s).
M5 Competition F90 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,34 seconds (calibrated simulation).
M5 Competition F90: 625 hp, ratio 3,03 kg/hp. e-tron GT quattro: 577 hp, ratio 3,95 kg/hp.
M5 Competition F90: 250 km/h. e-tron GT quattro: 245 km/h.