Over 0–100 km/h, X3 M40i G01 wins (4,78 s vs 9,00 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X3 M40i G01 | 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,78 s−4,22 s | 9,00 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,02 s−3,74 s | 16,76 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,68 s−5,92 s | 29,60 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+36 km/h | 214 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,13 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,88 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X3 M40i G01 | 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,28 s | 2,63 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,12 s | 4,42 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,53 s | 6,95 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,78 s | 9,00 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,35 s | 11,79 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,65 s | 20,22 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 17,43 s | 41,14 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,02 s | 16,76 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,68 s | 29,60 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 214 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 845 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 156 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 240 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 230 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed automatic |
Off the line, the X3 M40i hits 100 km/h in 4.78 s versus 9.00 s for the 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8. At this point, the X3 M40i leads by 4.22 s and sits roughly 36 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the X3 M40i is doing 142 km/h against 118 km/h for the 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8. The gap is 2.82 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the X3 M40i crosses the line in 13.02 s versus 16.76 s. The 3.74 s gap represents roughly 143 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the X3 M40i continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 197 km/h versus 164 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the X3 M40i finishes in 23.67 s versus 29.59 s, with a 5.92 s lead.
Electronically capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the X3 M40i never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (5.13 kg/hp vs 7.88 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.40 seconds. The 4.22 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, X3 M40i G01 wins (4,78 s vs 9,00 s).
X3 M40i G01 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,78 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X3 M40i G01: 360 hp, ratio 5,13 kg/hp. 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8: 156 hp, ratio 7,88 kg/hp.
X3 M40i G01: 250 km/h. 3 Crossback PureTech 155 EAT8: 214 km/h.