Over 0–100 km/h, X3 M40i G01 wins (4,78 s vs 6,15 s).
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| X3 M40i G01 | ID.4 GTX | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 4,78 s−1,37 s | 6,15 s |
| 400 m standing start | 13,02 s−1,46 s | 14,48 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,68 s−3,16 s | 26,84 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 250 km/h+70 km/h | 180 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 5,13 kg/hpbetter ratio | 7,33 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | X3 M40i G01 | ID.4 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,28 s | 1,58 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,12 s | 2,63 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 3,53 s | 4,45 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 4,78 s | 6,15 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 6,35 s | 8,35 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 10,65 s | 15,21 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 17,43 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 13,02 s | 14,48 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 23,68 s | 26,84 s |
| Top speed limited | 250 km/h | 180 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 360 hp | 6 cyl |
| Torque | 500 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 845 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | 8-speed Steptronic |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 299 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 460 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 193 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the X3 M40i hits 100 km/h in 4.78 s versus 6.15 s for the ID.4 GTX. Despite lacking instant torque, 360 hp of power compensates. At this point, the X3 M40i leads by 1.37 s and sits roughly 13 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the X3 M40i is doing 142 km/h against 128 km/h for the ID.4 GTX. The gap is 0.92 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the X3 M40i crosses the line in 13.02 s versus 14.48 s. The 1.46 s gap represents roughly 62 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the X3 M40i continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 197 km/h versus 175 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the X3 M40i finishes in 23.67 s versus 26.83 s, with a 3.16 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the X3 M40i is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the ID.4 GTX at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.71 seconds. The 1.37 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, X3 M40i G01 wins (4,78 s vs 6,15 s).
X3 M40i G01 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,78 seconds (calibrated simulation).
X3 M40i G01: 360 hp, ratio 5,13 kg/hp. ID.4 GTX: 299 hp, ratio 7,33 kg/hp.
X3 M40i G01: 250 km/h. ID.4 GTX: 180 km/h.