Over 0–100 km/h, Cayenne Turbo S 958.2 wins (3,96 s vs 4,34 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Cayenne Turbo S 958.2 | X5 M50i G05 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 3,96 s−0,38 s | 4,34 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,12 s−0,31 s | 12,43 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,14 s−0,37 s | 22,51 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 283 km/h+33 km/h | 250 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 3,92 kg/hpbetter ratio | 4,25 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Cayenne Turbo S 958.2 | X5 M50i G05 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,04 s | 1,23 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 1,73 s | 2,03 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 2,97 s | 3,29 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 3,96 s | 4,34 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 5,30 s | 5,63 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 8,67 s | 9,15 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 13,88 s | 14,54 s |
| 400 m standing start | 12,12 s | 12,43 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 22,14 s | 22,51 s |
| Top speed limited | 283 km/h | 250 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 570 hp | V8 |
| Torque | 800 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 235 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | TORQUE_CONVERTER |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 530 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 750 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 250 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | Eight-speed Steptronic transmission |
Off the line, the Cayenne Turbo S hits 100 km/h in 3.96 s versus 4.34 s for the X5 M50i. At this point, the Cayenne Turbo S leads by 0.38 s and sits roughly 6 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Cayenne Turbo S is doing 152 km/h against 150 km/h for the X5 M50i. The gap is 0.28 s. The gap remains stable from the start.
At 400 metres standing start, the Cayenne Turbo S crosses the line in 12.11 s versus 12.43 s. The 0.32 s gap represents roughly 16 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the Cayenne Turbo S continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 211 km/h versus 209 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Cayenne Turbo S finishes in 22.13 s versus 22.50 s, with a 0.37 s lead.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Cayenne Turbo S is capped at 283 km/h, the X5 M50i at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two combustion powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (3.92 kg/hp vs 4.25 kg/hp) and transmission (Unknown vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 6.38 seconds. The 0.38 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, Cayenne Turbo S 958.2 wins (3,96 s vs 4,34 s).
Cayenne Turbo S 958.2 goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 3,96 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Cayenne Turbo S 958.2: 570 hp, ratio 3,92 kg/hp. X5 M50i G05: 530 hp, ratio 4,25 kg/hp.
Cayenne Turbo S 958.2: 283 km/h. X5 M50i G05: 250 km/h.