Over 0–100 km/h, Atto 3 Extended Range wins (7,41 s vs 9,04 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Atto 3 Extended Range | e-208 136 Phase 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 7,41 s−1,63 s | 9,04 s |
| 400 m standing start | 15,57 s−1,22 s | 16,79 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,20 s−2,16 s | 31,36 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 160 km/h+10 km/h | 150 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 8,58 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,70 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Atto 3 Extended Range | e-208 136 Phase 2 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,96 s | 2,28 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,27 s | 3,81 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,43 s | 6,48 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 7,41 s | 9,04 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 10,03 s | 12,50 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 19,03 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 15,57 s | 16,79 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,20 s | 31,36 s |
| Top speed | 160 km/h | 150 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 750 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | - | |
| Gearbox | single-speed reduction |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 136 hp | Synchrone a aimants permanents 100 kW |
| Torque | 260 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 455 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the Atto 3 Extended Range hits 100 km/h in 7.41 s versus 9.04 s for the e-208 136 Phase 2. At this point, the Atto 3 Extended Range leads by 1.63 s and sits roughly 15 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the Atto 3 Extended Range is doing 121 km/h against 113 km/h for the e-208 136 Phase 2. The gap is 0.81 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the Atto 3 Extended Range crosses the line in 15.57 s versus 16.78 s. The 1.22 s gap represents roughly 46 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.
Past 400 metres, the Atto 3 Extended Range continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 160 km/h versus 150 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Atto 3 Extended Range finishes in 29.19 s versus 31.36 s, with a 2.17 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (160 vs 150 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Atto 3 Extended Range is capped at 160 km/h, the e-208 136 Phase 2 at 150 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (8.58 kg/hp vs 10.70 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 14.78 seconds. The 1.63 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Over 0–100 km/h, Atto 3 Extended Range wins (7,41 s vs 9,04 s).
Atto 3 Extended Range goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 7,41 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Atto 3 Extended Range: 204 hp, ratio 8,58 kg/hp. e-208 136 Phase 2: 136 hp, ratio 10,70 kg/hp.
Atto 3 Extended Range: 160 km/h. e-208 136 Phase 2: 150 km/h.