Among the 8 city cars electric 2023–2027, the e-208 136 Phase 2 ranks 6th of 8 in WLTP range (356 km, behind the Peugeot e-208 156 Phase 2), DC charge power (100 kW, behind the Peugeot e-208 136 Phase 2), 7th of 8 in 0–100 km/h (9.0 s, behind the Alpine A290 GTS 192kW).
e-208 136 Phase 2
136 hp, 356 km range, 9,0 s 0-100 : among the 8 city cars electric 2023–2027, the e-208 136 Phase 2 ranks 6th of 8 in WLTP range, DC charge power, 7th of 8 in 0–100 km/h. Here is what the Caralogy simulations say.
Power
136hp
260 Nm · 136 hp elec
0 → 100 km/h
9.0s
VMax 150 km/h
Range
356km
WLTP
DC charging
100kW
Full specifications Peugeot e-208 136 Phase 2
Manufacturer data and values calibrated by the Caralogy simulation engine.
Powertrain
| Puissance électrique | 136 hp |
| Combined power | 136 hp |
| Couple | 260 Nm |
| Gearbox | Mono-rapport Automatique |
| Transmission | Traction |
Battery and charging
| Battery capacity | 46.3 kWh |
| Range WLTP | 356 km |
| Charge AC max | 11 kW |
| Charge DC max | 100 kW |
| Conso élec WLTP | 15.7 kWh/100km |
Performance
| 0 → 100 km/h | 9,0 s |
| VMax | 150 km/h |
Dimensions and environment
| Length | 4,055 mm |
| Wheelbase | 2,540 mm |
| Width | 1,745 mm |
| Height | 1,430 mm |
| Kerb weight | 1,455 kg |
| Cd | 0.31 |
Caralogy Methodology
Motorway and performance values calibrated by the Caralogy physics simulation engine (SCx, Crr, real torque curves).
See full methodology →Manufacturer data · motorway values calibrated by the Caralogy engine
Among the 8 city cars electric, the e-208 136 Phase 2 ranks (mid-table) in WLTP range. Caralogy simulates its real-world behaviour: motorway simulation, consumption simulation and performance simulation.
Tailored to this vehicle?
city car electric among the best in segment: DC charge power (100 kW).
Some metrics lag behind the segment. Check the rankings above to identify weak points.
If the priority is WLTP range, the Peugeot e-208 156 Phase 2 (1st with 427 km) takes the lead. If the priority is 0–100 km/h, the Alpine A290 GTS 192kW (1st with 5.4 s) takes the lead.
Real-world range: 356 km WLTP (6th of 8 in WLTP range)
The e-208 136 Phase 2 offers 356 km of WLTP range. The segment reference is the Peugeot e-208 156 Phase 2 (427 km).
Charging: 100 kW DC (DC charge power)
The e-208 136 Phase 2 accepts up to 100 kW DC fast charging. The segment reference is the Peugeot e-208 136 Phase 2 (100 kW).
Recalculate everything for your own profile with the three physics simulators that power this page.
Running cost for your profile
Adjust mileage, driving mix and charging type to estimate your annual energy budget.
Launch simulator →Long-distance trip
Simulate any motorway trip: time, charging stops, total cost.
Simulate a trip →Chronos & accélération
0-100, 0-200, courbe de vitesse, positionnement segment.
Voir la performance →Autonomie réelle
Simulez l’autonomie selon la vitesse, la température et le style.
Simuler l’autonomie →Where the e-208 136 Phase 2 stands against city cars electric
Comparison across 8 city cars electric marketed between 2023–2027.
Direct rivals (same segment, same energy)
Cross-energy alternatives
Same needs, different powertrain.
The full Peugeot e-208 I range
Generation I launched in 2019. Available versions sorted by energy.
Other versions of the I
Popular duels involving the e-208 136 Phase 2
Peugeot e-208 136 Phase 2: what you need to know
Well-argued answers to the most asked questions about this model, based on Caralogy data and simulations.
356 km WLTP announced — making it the 6th of 8 in autonomie du segment out of 8 models. The reference is the Peugeot e-208 156 Phase 2 (427 km).
Running costs depend on your profile (mileage, charging type, city/highway mix). Use the Caralogy consumption simulator for a personalised estimate.
The Peugeot e-208 156 Phase 2 leads in WLTP range (427 km vs 356 km). The choice depends on your priorities: check the e-208 136 Phase 2 vs Peugeot e-208 156 Phase 2 duel for a detailed comparison.
Caralogy does not reproduce manufacturer figures: we recalculate every number through physics simulation, starting from SCx, mass and the power curve. This is why our figures at 130 km/h differ from WLTP. Full methodology on the dedicated page.