Sur 0–100 km/h, 5 E-Tech Electric 150 gagne (8,12 s vs 9,04 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| 5 E-Tech Electric 150 | e-208 136 Phase 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,12 s−0,92 s | 9,04 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,14 s−0,65 s | 16,79 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 30,62 s−0,74 s | 31,36 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 150 km/h | 150 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 10,16 kg/hpbetter ratio | 10,70 kg/hp |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | 5 E-Tech Electric 150 | e-208 136 Phase 2 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,07 s | 2,28 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,46 s | 3,81 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 5,85 s | 6,48 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,12 s | 9,04 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,18 s | 12,50 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,14 s | 16,79 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 30,62 s | 31,36 s |
| Top speed | 150 km/h | 150 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 245 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 524 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 136 hp | Synchrone a aimants permanents 100 kW |
| Torque | 260 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 455 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 hits 100 km/h in 8.12 s versus 9.04 s for the e-208 136 Phase 2. At this point, the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 leads by 0.92 s and sits roughly 10 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 is doing 117 km/h against 113 km/h for the e-208 136 Phase 2. The gap is 0.47 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 crosses the line in 16.13 s versus 16.78 s. The 0.65 s gap represents roughly 25 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 150 km/h versus 150 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 finishes in 30.62 s versus 31.36 s, with a 0.74 s lead. Both vehicles have similar top speeds (150 vs 150 km/h), preventing any comeback.
Both rivals share the same electronic speed cap: the 5 E-Tech Electric 150 and the e-208 136 Phase 2 are governed to 150 km/h. At that speed, standard-fit tyres approach their safety threshold — an industrial ceiling common to most electric vehicles in this segment. Neither car shows its true aerodynamic potential in this duel.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (10.16 kg/hp vs 10.70 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 14.78 seconds. The 0.92 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, 5 E-Tech Electric 150 gagne (8,12 s vs 9,04 s).
5 E-Tech Electric 150 passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 8,12 secondes (simulation calibrée).
5 E-Tech Electric 150 : 150 hp, ratio 10,16 kg/hp. e-208 136 Phase 2 : 136 hp, ratio 10,70 kg/hp.
5 E-Tech Electric 150 : 150 km/h. e-208 136 Phase 2 : 150 km/h.