Skip to main content
CaralogyCaralogy
HomeBrandsRoad TripBudgetDuelGuides
Caralogy

The car comparison platform. Physics simulation, road trips, real costs.

Navigation
All brandsCar duelRunning costsMotorwayMethodology
Simulators
Motorway simulatorRunning costsPerformance duel
Brands
VolkswagenBMWMercedesToyotaTeslaAudi
FRENDEESIT
© 2026 Caralogy · All rights reserved
  1. Home
  2. /Duel
  3. /SUV
AFormentorPetrolvsBID.4BEV
  • MotorwayMotorwayRange and charging
  • PerformancePerformance0-100, top speed
  • ConsumptionConsumptionYearly cost
  • SpecsFormentor · ID.4

Cupra Formentor VZ vs Volkswagen ID.4 GTX: which is truly faster?

Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.

compact SUV · 2020 vs 2022 · Methodology
CupraPetrolFaster

Formentor VZ

300 hp · 400 Nm · 1,630 kg · 2020

VS
VolkswagenBEV

ID.4 GTX

299 hp · 460 Nm · 2,193 kg · 2022

Result · 0–100 km/h

ACupra Formentor VZ

4.96 s

Gap1.19 sin favour of Formentor VZ
BVolkswagen ID.4 GTX

6.15 s

Summary · Caralogy simulation
MeasureFormentor VZID.4 GTXGap
0–100 km/h4.96 s6.15 s1.19 s · Formentor VZ
400 m standing start13.26 s14.48 s1.22 s · Formentor VZ
1,000 m standing start23.96 s26.84 s2.88 s · Formentor VZ
Top speed (electronically limited)250 km/h180 km/h70 km/h · Formentor VZ
Power-to-weight ratio5.43 kg/hp7.33 kg/hpbetter ratio · Formentor VZ

Watch the race

Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.

CupraPetrolFormentor VZ
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
VolkswagenBEVID.4 GTX
Speed
0km/h
Timer
0,00s
Distance
0m
100 m
200 m
300 m
400 m
500 m
600 m
700 m
800 m
900 m
1000 m
0m → 1000m
Gap0m

Stage-by-stage comparison

Simulated performance at each stage. Best value in bold.
StageFormentor VZID.4 GTX
0–30 km/h1.56 s · tight gap1.58 s
0–50 km/h2.31 s2.63 s
0–80 km/h3.74 s4.45 s
0–100 km/h4.96 s6.15 s
0–120 km/h6.62 s8.35 s
0–160 km/h11.03 s15.21 s
0–200 km/h17.73 s-
400 m standing start13.26 s14.48 s
1,000 m standing start23.96 s26.84 s
Top speed limited250 km/h180 km/h

Parameters and assumptions

Simulation

Start
Standing, straight line
Surface
Dry asphalt, 23°C
Wind
None
Driver
1 person, 75 kg

Calibration

Splits
0–100, 0–200 manufacturer
Power curve
Real measurement (Caralogy)
VMax
Manufacturer limited
Transmission
Losses integrated in model

Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.

Under the bonnet

Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.

Cupra

Formentor VZ

5,43kg/hpratio better by 1,90 kg/hp
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power300 hpPending
Torque400 Nm
Weight1 630 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
Gearbox7-speed DSG
Volkswagen

ID.4 GTX

7,33kg/hpcompensated by −563 kg
CharacteristicValueDetail
Power299 hpDual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor
Torque460 Nm
Weight2 193 kgmanufacturer kerb weight
DrivetrainIntegrale (AWD)
GearboxSingle-speed fixed gear

The start: 0 to 100 km/h

Off the line, the Formentor VZ hits 100 km/h in 4.96 s versus 6.15 s for the ID.4 GTX. Despite lacking instant torque, 300 hp of power compensates. At this point, the Formentor VZ leads by 1.19 s and sits roughly 8 m ahead.

From 100 km/h to 400 metres

At 200 metres, the Formentor VZ is doing 142 km/h against 128 km/h for the ID.4 GTX. The gap is 0.71 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.

At 400 metres standing start, the Formentor VZ crosses the line in 13.25 s versus 14.48 s. The 1.22 s gap represents roughly 52 m of track - a gap visible to the naked eye.

Beyond 400 metres: top speed comes into play

Past 400 metres, the Formentor VZ continues to build its lead. At 600 metres, it runs at 197 km/h versus 175 km/h. At 1,000 metres, the Formentor VZ finishes in 23.95 s versus 26.83 s, with a 2.88 s lead.

What the numbers don’t tell you

Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the Formentor VZ is capped at 250 (i.e. 155 mph - industry threshold) km/h, the ID.4 GTX at 180 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit - it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.

Instant electric torque gives an advantage off the line. The higher top speed of the combustion engine gives an advantage over longer distances. The distance at which one catches the other depends on the top speed differential.

In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 9.71 seconds. The 1.19 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.

Other duels you might be interested in

TeslaVSVolkswagen

Model Y Juniper RWD vs ID.4 GTX

AudiVSVolkswagen

Q6 SUV e-tron vs ID.4 GTX

AudiVSVolkswagen

Q6 Sportback e-tron vs ID.4 GTX

VolkswagenVSXpeng

ID.4 GTX vs G6

Frequently asked questions

Over 0–100 km/h, Formentor VZ wins (4,96 s vs 6,15 s).

Formentor VZ goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 4,96 seconds (calibrated simulation).

Formentor VZ: 300 hp, ratio 5,43 kg/hp. ID.4 GTX: 299 hp, ratio 7,33 kg/hp.

Formentor VZ: 250 km/h. ID.4 GTX: 180 km/h.