Sur 0–100 km/h, ID.4 GTX gagne (6,15 s vs 6,82 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| ID.4 GTX | G6 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 6,15 s−0,67 s | 6,82 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,48 s−0,48 s | 14,96 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,84 s | 26,82 s+0,02 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 180 km/h | 200 km/h−20 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 7,33 kg/hp | 6,99 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | ID.4 GTX | G6 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 1,58 s | 1,81 s |
| 0–50 km/h | 2,63 s | 3,01 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 4,45 s | 5,00 s |
| 0–100 km/h | 6,15 s | 6,82 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 8,35 s | 9,13 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 15,21 s | 15,54 s |
| 0–200 km/h | — | 25,78 s |
| 400 m standing start | 14,48 s | 14,96 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 26,84 s | 26,82 stight gap |
| Top speed | 180 km/h | 200 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 299 hp | Dual Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 460 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 193 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Integrale (AWD) | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 292 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 440 Nm | |
| Weight | 2 040 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Propulsion | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the ID.4 GTX hits 100 km/h in 6.15 s versus 6.82 s for the G6. At this point, the ID.4 GTX leads by 0.67 s and sits roughly 9 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the ID.4 GTX is doing 128 km/h against 126 km/h for the G6. The gap is 0.44 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the ID.4 GTX crosses the line in 14.48 s versus 14.96 s. The 0.48 s gap represents roughly 21 m of track — two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the situation changes. The ID.4 GTX maxes out at 180 km/h while the G6 keeps accelerating towards 200 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap has dropped to 0.44 s.
Around 990 metres, both vehicles are level. This is the inversion point: the G6 overcomes its launch deficit thanks to a 20 km/h higher top speed.
At 1,000 metres, the G6 finishes in 26.81 s versus 26.83 s. The 0.02 s delta shows an extremely tight race.
The ID.4 GTX features all-wheel drive (AWD) against the G6’s RWD. At low speeds (0-30, 0-50, 0-80 km/h), AWD doubles the driven contact area: all four wheels transmit torque to the road, virtually eliminating wheelspin at launch. This traction advantage is decisive in the range where the motor delivers peak torque, before power and aerodynamics take over.
Both rivals are electronically governed, but not at the same level: the ID.4 GTX is capped at 180 km/h, the G6 at 200 km/h. This isn’t a physical engine limit — it’s a manufacturer choice, usually for tyre safety or homologation reasons. Neither car reaches its true aerodynamic top speed.
With two electric powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (7.33 kg/hp vs 6.99 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 10.49 seconds. The 0.67 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Sur 0–100 km/h, ID.4 GTX gagne (6,15 s vs 6,82 s).
ID.4 GTX passe de 0 à 100 km/h en 6,15 secondes (simulation calibrée).
ID.4 GTX : 299 hp, ratio 7,33 kg/hp. G6 : 292 hp, ratio 6,99 kg/hp.
ID.4 GTX : 180 km/h. G6 : 200 km/h.