Over 0–100 km/h, e:Ny1 wins (7,76 s vs 8,31 s).
Performance comparison
Simulated drag race 0 → 1,000 m in real time. Synchronised speed counters and stopwatch. Physics calibration on 7 manufacturer measurements.
Simulation
Calibration
Physics model calibrated on manufacturer splits. The limited top speed is not the real aerodynamic top speed of the vehicles.
| Terramar | e:Ny1 | |
|---|---|---|
| 0–100 km/h | 8,31 s | 7,76 s+0,55 s |
| 400 m standing start | 16,25 s | 15,82 s+0,43 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,41 s | 29,41 s+0,00 s |
| Top speed (electronically limited) | 214 km/h+54 km/h | 160 km/h |
| Power-to-weight ratio | 9,00 kg/hp | 8,34 kg/hpbetter ratio |
Standing-start drag race, calibrated on manufacturer splits. The gap shows at each stage.
Simulated performance at each stage. Winner in green.
| Palier | Terramar | e:Ny1 |
|---|---|---|
| 0–30 km/h | 2,27 s | 2,17 stight gap |
| 0–50 km/h | 3,44 s | 3,63 s |
| 0–80 km/h | 6,00 s | 5,87 stight gap |
| 0–100 km/h | 8,31 s | 7,76 s |
| 0–120 km/h | 11,46 s | 10,24 s |
| 0–160 km/h | 20,91 s | 18,60 s |
| 0–200 km/h | 45,12 s | - |
| 400 m standing start | 16,25 s | 15,82 s |
| 1,000 m standing start | 29,41 s | 29,41 s |
| Top speed | 214 km/h | 160 km/h |
Manufacturer technical specifications. The power-to-weight ratio is the key physical factor in a drag race.
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 201 hp | Pending |
| Torque | 300 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 810 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | 7-speed DSG |
| Characteristic | Value | Detail |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 201 hp | Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor |
| Torque | 310 Nm | |
| Weight | 1 677 kg | manufacturer kerb weight |
| Drivetrain | Traction | |
| Gearbox | Single-speed fixed gear |
Off the line, the e:Ny1 hits 100 km/h in 7.76 s versus 8.31 s for the Terramar. At this point, the e:Ny1 leads by 0.55 s and sits roughly 1 m ahead.
At 200 metres, the e:Ny1 is doing 122 km/h against 116 km/h for the Terramar. The gap is 0.18 s. The challenger starts to claw back ground.
At 400 metres standing start, the e:Ny1 crosses the line in 15.82 s versus 16.25 s. The 0.43 s gap represents roughly 17 m of track - two to three car lengths.
Past 400 metres, the gap narrows. The e:Ny1 maxes out at 160 km/h while the Terramar keeps accelerating towards 214 km/h. At 600 metres, the gap is down to 0.57 s from 0.43 s at 400 metres.
At 1,000 metres, the e:Ny1 finishes in 29.40 s versus 29.41 s, with just 0.01 s to spare. The Terramar fails to fully close the launch gap.
Electronically capped at 160 km/h, the e:Ny1 never reaches its natural aerodynamic ceiling in this duel. That’s not a physical limit of the motor - it’s a deliberate manufacturer decision, typically tied to standard-fit tyre ratings or model-range positioning.
With two plug-in hybrid powertrains, the difference comes down to power-to-weight ratio (9.00 kg/hp vs 8.34 kg/hp) and transmission (Automatic vs Automatic).
In European road use (130 km/h max), both vehicles reach the legal speed limit in under 13.30 seconds. The 0.55 s difference in 0 to 100 km/h is mostly felt in motorway merging and overtaking.
Swap one of the two models to explore an equivalent duel in the same segment.
Over 0–100 km/h, e:Ny1 wins (7,76 s vs 8,31 s).
Terramar goes from 0 to 100 km/h in 8,31 seconds (calibrated simulation).
Terramar: 201 hp, ratio 9,00 kg/hp. e:Ny1: 201 hp, ratio 8,34 kg/hp.
Terramar: 214 km/h. e:Ny1: 160 km/h.